|
|
|
Windows Secrets Newsletter • Issue 187 • 2009-03-05 • Circulation: over 400,000 |
|
AD
|
|
Table of contents INTRODUCTION: Articles lead to scintillating conversations TOP STORY: AutoRun patch a long time coming for XP users KNOWN ISSUES: Norton security suite's top rating questioned WACKY WEB WEEK: New laptop does away with extraneous features! LANGALIST PLUS: For backups, RAID mirroring is not the answer BEST SOFTWARE: New Firefox extension beats McAfee SiteAdvisor WOODY'S WINDOWS: Save on PCs by using Win7's Experience Index |
|
ADS
|
|
INTRODUCTION Articles lead to scintillating conversations
By
Brian Livingston
What I like about bringing you a mass of information every week is knowing that we'll never get everyone to agree. Our recent articles on McAfee's SiteAdvisor service and an updated version of the WS Security Baseline have proved this principle yet again. I started the Security Baseline in an article back on June 3, 2004. Almost five years later, the most recent version of the feature was reported last week by contributing editor Ryan Russell. The idea has always been that PC users need a simple explanation of their minimum required defenses. Computer experts can add further layers to this baseline if they wish to gain extra protection. If you're a less-advanced Windows user, you can use the list yourself — or show it to your parents, your small-business manager, or whomever — to explain why a store-bought PC can't just be plugged into the Internet and stay secure. Because Windows Secrets doesn't have its own test lab, we've always collected findings from published sources and given you our analysis of the products that currently hold the most top ratings. I feel we could do a better job by scrutinizing more test results and bringing you a wider summary of the latest data. Dennis O'Reilly, our technical editor, brings you suggestions from our readers on this subject in his Known Issues column today. I encourage you to give us any feedback you can share. Another article that made waves recently was contributing editor Mark Edwards's lead story on Feb. 12 about the timeliness of Web security ratings by SiteAdvisor, a service of McAfee Inc. I assisted Mark in researching that story. In a follow-up column I published on Feb. 19, McAfee released for the first time its internal schedule for responding to complaints of false positives. In my follow-up, I promised that Windows Secrets would soon review more site-security rating alternatives. WS senior editor Gizmo Richards has answered this call in his Best Software column today. He's found a promising add-on that combines the best of nine different testing platforms. Version 1.0.1 of the app was released as recently as Mar. 1, which makes it a new bright spot in PC security. If you're a free subscriber to Windows Secrets, you aren't receiving Gizmo's columns in our e-mails — but don't worry, it's easy to get them. There's no fixed fee. We accept any financial contribution of any amount, whatever you feel our research is worth to you. We want as many people as possible to have this information. How to get our paid content We'll keep bringing you everything we can find. Together, we'll keep each other as safe as possible, so you can enjoy Windows and not have to watch your back so much. Thanks for your support. All readers can get the secrets of mental feats
|
|
ADS
|
|
TOP STORY AutoRun patch a long time coming for XP users
By
Susan Bradley
Nearly 18 months after it was discovered, Microsoft has finally fixed a hole in the AutoRun function of older Windows versions that allowed viruses to spread via external storage devices. While it's good to know Microsoft is finally listening to the complaints of the Windows community, the company's delay in applying important patches put our systems at risk unnecessarily. The old saying about the squeaky wheel getting the grease applies to the manner in which Microsoft prioritizes its product fixes. The more noise customers make, the more likely the problems will be rectified. Most recently, the Conficker worm has been spreading across networks, often entering systems via USB flash drives and other removable media. Shamefully, Microsoft could have — and should have — prevented this massive infection from happening in the first place. In October 2007, Nick Brown documented in his blog how viruses and worms were entering his network via USB memory sticks. The next month, WS associate editor Scott Dunn explained in a Top Story on Nov. 8, 2007, the fact that Microsoft's suggested settings to disable AutoRun weren't effective. He described the so-called @SYS trick, which allows you to truly disable AutoRun, preventing infected devices from launching their attacks. Fast-forward to one year ago. Will Dormann and US-CERT (the United States Computer Emergency Readiness Team) published information on Mar. 20, 2008, confirming that Microsoft's AutoRun advice didn't block threats. The same @SYS workaround that Scott documented was supported by US-CERT in its alert. In July 2008, Microsoft released security bulletin MS08-038. The patch in this bulletin made it possible for users to control AutoRun properly, but only on Windows Vista and Server 2008. XP, Win 2K, Server 2003 users left in the lurch So what happened to the equivalent patch for Windows 2000, XP, and Server 2003? In May 2008, Microsoft had in fact released a patch for these systems, which is described in Knowledge Base article 953252. However, as described in a Jan. 22, 2009, Computerworld article, US-CERT found that the fix for XP/2000/2003 had to be applied manually. Furthermore, Microsoft was not making the patch available automatically via any Windows Update service. It wasn't until Feb. 24 of this year that Microsoft distributed this patch via Windows Update to XP, 2000, and 2003. This is described in the company's security advisory 967940. Many home and business PC users rarely deploy patches that aren't available through Windows Update, Microsoft Update, or WSUS (Windows Software Update Services). Add to this the confusing and conflicting information about the AutoRun patch, and it's no wonder the Conficker worm, which exploits AutoRun functionality, made the inroads that it did. You may be wondering why it took Microsoft so long to distribute for XP/2000/2003 users the fix that permits AutoRun to be properly disabled. One clue may be found in the file versions listed in KB article 967715. The Windows Server 2003 files are dated Feb. 10, 2009. Typically, Microsoft doesn't release a fix for one platform if it's still developing a fix for another platform. This is done to avoid putting one set of customers at risk while protecting others. That's usually a valid reason to wait before distributing patches. But when you open up the files described in the earlier KB article 953252, you find that all the files in that hotfix date back to mid-2008. Why did it take an admonition from CERT to convince Microsoft to add this vital fix to Automatic Updates for those versions of Windows? To make things even more confusing, the way Microsoft released the XP/2000/2003 fix at the end of February caused many people to think it was an out-of-cycle security patch. If this patch had been pushed to all Windows users sooner, much of Conficker's pain might have been avoided. Microsoft's Feb. 6 TechNet alert makes the problem clear. Among other things, the Conficker worm uses the AutoPlay feature (which is related to but separate from AutoRun) to infect PCs via USB drives and other portable storage devices. This vulnerability occurs even if the systems have installed the update described in Microsoft security bulletin MS08-067. Therefore, the TechNet article recommends disabling AutoRun, saying:
For home users, I'm not yet ready to pull the fire alarm and tell everyone to disable AutoRun. But I do urge you to be very leery of plugging USB flash drives into your system if you're unsure whether they've been used on other computers. Large organizations, however, should consider disabling AutoRun on their networked PCs, considering how hard it's been to stomp out the Conficker worm and others. How to apply the patches and control AutoRun If you followed the instructions in Scott's 2007 article to block AutoRun by adding a Registry key, you should remove the key before applying the Microsoft AutoRun patch to prevent any possible interaction. Take the following steps for complete protection:
Susan Bradley recently received an MVP (Most Valuable Professional) award from Microsoft for her knowledge in the areas of Small Business Server and network security. She's also a partner in a California CPA firm. |
|
KNOWN ISSUES Norton security suite's top rating questioned
By
Dennis O'Reilly
Readers beg to differ with the reviews of top tech magazines that recently named Norton Internet Security 2009 the best security suite. Whether the security apps are from Symantec, McAfee, or some lesser-known vendor, our readers point fingers at them as the source of many performance and connectivity problems. Ryan Russell's Feb. 26 Top Story updated the WS Security Baseline by reporting that Symantec's Norton Internet Security 2009 was the top choice of three prominent technology publishers: PC World, PCMag.com, and Maximum PC. A reader by the name of Manny is less impressed with this product — much less impressed:
A vote for Microsoft's file-sync service The five sync services reviewed by Scott Dunn in the Feb. 26 Best Software column (paid content) offered something for everyone. However, that didn't stop Mark Vozzo from writing in to tell us of his favorite sync tool, which happens to be from a company you may have heard of before:
The Known Issues column brings you readers' comments on our recent articles. Dennis O'Reilly is technical editor of WindowsSecrets.com. |
|
WACKY WEB WEEK New laptop does away with extraneous features!
|
|
ADS
|
|
PERMALINKS Use these permalinks to share info with friends We love it when you include the links shown below in e-mails to your friends. This is better than forwarding your copy of our e-mail newsletter. (When our newsletter is forwarded, some recipients click "report as spam," and corporate filters start blocking our e-mails.) The following link includes all articles this week: http://WindowsSecrets.com/comp/090305 Free content posted on Mar. 5, 2009:
You get all of the following in our paid content:
Thanks in advance for your support! |
|
YOUR SUBSCRIPTION The Windows Secrets Newsletter is published weekly on the 1st through 4th Thursdays of each month, plus occasional news updates. We skip an issue on the 5th Thursday of any month, the week of Thanksgiving, and the last two weeks of August and December. Windows Secrets resulted from the merger of several publications: Brian's Buzz on Windows and Woody's Windows Watch in 2004, the LangaList in 2006, and the Support Alert Newsletter in 2008. Publisher: WindowsSecrets.com LLC, Attn: #120 Editor, 1700 7th Ave., Suite 116, Seattle, WA 98101-1323 USA. Vendors, please send no unsolicited packages to this address (readers' letters are fine). Editorial Director: Brian Livingston. Senior Editor: Ian Richards. Editor-at-Large: Fred Langa. Technical Editor: Dennis O'Reilly. Program Director: Tony Johnston. Program Manager: Ryan Biesemeyer. Web Developer: Damian Wadley. Editorial Assistant: Katy Abby. Copyeditor: Roberta Scholz. Contributing Editors: Susan Bradley, Scott Dunn, Mark Joseph Edwards, Stuart J. Johnston, Woody Leonhard, Ryan Russell, Becky Waring. Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, Support Alert, LangaList, LangaList Plus, WinFind, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of WindowsSecrets.com LLC. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners. HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: Anyone may subscribe to this newsletter by visiting our free signup page. WE GUARANTEE YOUR PRIVACY: 1. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever. 2. We will never send you any unrequested e-mail, besides newsletter updates. 3. All unsubscribe requests are honored immediately, period. Privacy policy HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: To unsubscribe from the Windows Secrets Newsletter,
|