Results 1 to 2 of 2
Thread: Access versions (2003)
2008-04-02, 17:46 #1
- Join Date
- Sep 2001
- Stuck at work..., Missouri, USA
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Access versions (2003)
I have Access 2003 installed.
I have many .mdb files I'm taking over in my new job that when I open them in 2003 it says "Access 2000 file format" in the title bar.
I'm assuming I can convert them to 2003 format, but should I?
What are the pros/cons of updating?
Thanks!<font face="Comic Sans MS">Morgan Erickson</font face=comic>
<img src=/S/flags/USA.gif border=0 alt=USA width=30 height=18>-From <img src=/S/flags/Colorado.gif border=0 alt=Colorado width=30 height=18> but living in <img src=/S/flags/Missouri.gif border=0 alt=Missouri width=30 height=18>...and working in Kansas.
2008-04-02, 17:54 #2
- Join Date
- Mar 2002
- Thanked 29 Times in 29 Posts
Re: Access versions (2003)
Access 2003 can work with databases in Access 2000 format and Access 2002/2003 format without converting. I'd stay with Access 2000 format for the following reasons:
- The files are smaller.
- The format is more stable.
- The databases can be used by others who have Access 2000, Access 2002, Access 2003 or Access 2007.
The only disadvantage is that you cannot create a .mde database from an Access 2000 format .mdb.
The Access 2002/23003 format has no real advantages above the Access 2000 format.