View Poll Results: What firewall do you use for small business?
- 4. You may not vote on this poll
Results 1 to 3 of 3
2011-02-02, 10:13 #1
- Join Date
- Mar 2003
- New Jersey, USA
- Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
"Business Class" hardware firewall really needed?
I've installed several Sonicwall / Firebox firewalls at client locations. Lately, for single user / small offices I've used a Netgear N600 (WNDR3700) , which has SPI and NAT firewall protection. I realize that it is likely not nearly as sophisticated as a "commercial" firewall, but I've never had a problem using the NetGear and it has some great features for the price.
Most of my clients use Small Business Server 2003/2008 and I also run Enterprise antivirus on all workstations and keep them pretty well locked down. Most clients also use third party mail filtering (Postini) for additional security against spam/malware, etc. Maybe I'm lucky, but I've had ZERO instances over the past 10 years of a client network being compromised by an attack through their firewall/router, whether it was a Sonicwall, Netgear, Linksys, Dlink, etc.
My question is what is sacrificed (in terms of safety) by using something like the Netgear WNDR3700 versus, say a Sonicwall TZ200 WirelessN? Please feel free to describe, in laymans terms (I'm no firewall expert), the benefits that the Sonicwall offers to justify the price difference (over triple the cost of the WNDR3700) to my clients. In today's environment it's often hard to convince clients to open their wallets that wide for what they consider a "black box".
Or, do the higher-end models of the major brands (like Linksys, Dlink, Netgear, etc.) offer sufficient protection for a small office environment?
What has been your experience with whichever firewall(s) you've deployed - any security breaches, attacks, etc.?
Thanks for any and all input!
Last edited by scion111; 2011-02-02 at 10:22.
2011-02-02, 10:25 #2
- Join Date
- Mar 2004
- Manning, South Carolina
- Thanked 1,510 Times in 1,371 Posts
<OPINION>Most single user/small office lans are unlikely to suffer serious attack attempts because the potential reward is small, thus standard routers w/builtin hardware firewall along with a software firewall and anti-virus/malware products should be more than sufficient.</OPINION>
2011-02-03, 00:16 #3
- Join Date
- Feb 2008
- A cultural area in SW England
- Thanked 197 Times in 177 Posts
Conversely, I consider that the most important defence is the hardware firewall in your router!
At work, we don't use a software firewall on PCs or servers, because of the sheer difficulty of centralised maintenance of all the computers. Never had any problem over the last 5½ years as a result of this decision.
Lots of antivirus, though, and any incoming viruses in emails are trapped by our anti-spam system on Exchange.BATcher
"The trouble with quotes on the internet is that you can never know if they are genuine."