Results 1 to 7 of 7
  1. #1
    Super Moderator RetiredGeek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Manning, South Carolina
    Posts
    9,731
    Thanks
    395
    Thanked 1,533 Times in 1,390 Posts

    Don't buy a 3Tb Drive!

    Read the Life-Hacker Article. HTH
    May the Forces of good computing be with you!

    RG

    PowerShell & VBA Rule!

    My Systems: Desktop Specs
    Laptop Specs

  2. #2
    Silver Lounger wavy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    ny
    Posts
    2,485
    Thanks
    256
    Thanked 155 Times in 144 Posts
    Oh BackBlaze is back !
    Don't buy a 3Tb Drive!
    Or certainly not a Seagate if the stats are legit(and I have no reason to doubt their legitimascy) . But like I often say: Statistics don't lie but statisticians certainly do.


    Last edited by wavy; 2015-01-21 at 15:01. Reason: spelling checker missing in linux ;)
    David

    Just because you don't know where you are going doesn't mean any road will get you there.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator satrow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cardiff, UK
    Posts
    4,717
    Thanks
    316
    Thanked 611 Times in 510 Posts
    The latest returns stats from a Euro etailer suggests that some 4TB drives also have a relatively high rate of returns (though maybe for different reasons), additional stats on the conclusion page, as well.

    Best digested with a French bilingual for company over a few glasses of Burgundy, failing that, Google Translate and a cup of cocoa.

    This is the most recent (11th) in a regular series (search the Articles for "
    Dossier: Les taux de retour des composants") spanning several years, interesting reading for component selection and deciding whether/when to replace/retire current components.

  4. #4
    WS Lounge VIP
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    8,620
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 1,057 Times in 985 Posts
    By the time those stats come out the manufacturers have identified and probably fixed the issues. Besides, that's what backup and warranty are for.

    cheers, Paul

  5. #5
    5 Star Lounger
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    east coast
    Posts
    706
    Thanks
    89
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
    that claim was based on an erroneous analysis of cherry picked data

    look at all of it and you can find some 3TB that are more reliable

    in theory 4T has higher bit density and would less reliable than a 3T


    Quote Originally Posted by RetiredGeek View Post
    Read the Life-Hacker Article. HTH

  6. #6
    WS Lounge VIP
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    8,620
    Thanks
    56
    Thanked 1,057 Times in 985 Posts
    Do you have details on the dodgy data used?

    cheers, Paul

  7. #7
    5 Star Lounger
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    east coast
    Posts
    706
    Thanks
    89
    Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul T View Post
    Do you have details on the dodgy data used?

    cheers, Paul
    it was at the original site
    they listed all the drives and their failure rates

    one 4 beat a 3
    some 3s beat a 4

    but overall it was mostly random and had nothign to do with the total capacity

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •