Results 1 to 5 of 5
  1. #1
    New Lounger
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois, USA
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Lost formatting with INCLUDETEXT fields (2003 SP1)

    I

  2. #2
    Plutonium Lounger
    Join Date
    Mar 2002
    Posts
    84,353
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts

    Re: Lost formatting with INCLUDETEXT fields (2003 SP1)

    I think you should remove the * MERGEFORMAT switch. MERGEFORMAT preserves direct formatting that has been applied to the field result.

    If text in the source document is formatted with a style, and if the master document has a style with the same name but a different definition, the included text will use the style from the master document. This is unavoidable, since there can't be two definitions of the same style in a document. The only workaround is to try to avoid this situation.

  3. #3
    Uranium Lounger
    Join Date
    Dec 2000
    Location
    Los Angeles Area, California, USA
    Posts
    7,453
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Lost formatting with INCLUDETEXT fields (2003

    Hi Bruce:
    I haven't used Word 2003, but I have some observations as to what may be happening. Direct formatting should be brought over. However, bold, italic, etc. are toggle font properties & it's possible that they will come out opposite if the paragraph style has that property. Also, Includetext fields will bring over the text, but will not bring over the style. The style will be whatever the paragraph style in which you placed the Includetext field.

    If the style definitions are identical in master & included files, & you insert the Includetext field into a paragraph that has the identical style as the master, then the formatting should be the same.

  4. #4
    New Lounger
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois, USA
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Lost formatting with INCLUDETEXT fields (2003 SP1)

    Hans -- right on again. I deleted "* MERGEFORMAT" from one of the more troublesome includetext fields, and now it comes into the master document correctly formatted. Now I'm going to apply this idea to the other includetext fields. Thanks for your help!

    Bruce Watson

  5. #5
    New Lounger
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Chicago, Illinois, USA
    Posts
    9
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Re: Lost formatting with INCLUDETEXT fields (2003

    Phil -- thanks for the reply. It gave me some interesting things to think about.

    Bruce Watson

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •