Windows Secrets

Subscribers: Sign in

Enter your e-mail address to get a free subscription.
We guarantee your privacy
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Newsletter Archives
    • Current
    • LangaList Plus
    • Patch Watch
    • Wacky Web Week
    • Security Baseline
  • E-Books
  • Lounge
  • About us
    • Refunds
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Your Account
    • Upgrade
    • Preferences
    • Bonus Download
    • Unsubscribe
Home>Microsoft, McAfee, Symantec charge cards repeatedly

Windows Secrets Newsletter • Issue 108 • 2007-05-17 • Circulation: over 400,000


Table of contents 
  • Top Story: Microsoft, McAfee, Symantec charge cards repeatedly
  • Known Issues: What code signing is and isn’t good for
  • Wacky Web Week: Practice your bunny-surgery skills online
  • Known Issues: The reality of Microsoft’s signed-drivers policy
  • Woody's Windows: Windows Home Server looks like a winner
  • Perimeter Scan: Microsoft launches new security products

 
Top Story

Microsoft, McAfee, Symantec charge cards repeatedly

Scott dunn By Scott Dunn

These days, most antivirus and other security products come with a subscription to update your virus definitions.

Signing up usually means forced automatic subscription renewal, in which your credit card is charged every year, and it’s not easy to opt out — but I’ll show you how.

Subscription sabotage: a case study

IT consultant and Windows Secrets subscriber Bruce Weiskopf received a routine notice that his Norton Internet Security product subscription was about to expire. Then, when he began examining some online forms, he became upset. There, in the fine print, he noticed a clause saying he was already signed up for automatic subscription renewal.

“It’s barely noticeable, and, in any event, you aren’t given the opportunity to decline at this point,” he told Windows Secrets. All he could see was a link for more information. So, he went to the Symantec Web site to find out more.

According to Bruce, what ensued was an onerous process of hoop-jumping before he was finally able to tell the company not to renew his subscription and charge his credit card automatically each year.

“It’s really, really an unconscionable scam,” Bruce adds. “I’m sure there are many consumers who don’t pay attention to their credit card statements, enabling Symantec to make quite a profit at about $50 a pop!”

For those who feel as Bruce does, the unfortunate truth is that the practice of enrolling customers in automatic renewal for antivirus and other security products is not limited to Symantec. Indeed, it has become an industry standard. Microsoft Windows Live OneCare, Symantec, McAfee, and ZoneAlarm all enroll customers into the companies’ automatic subscription-renewal programs with the purchase of a subscription-based product. In most cases, customers aren’t given a choice to opt out, and only find out about the annual renewals when they receive an e-mail notice or see a charge on their credit card.

For some users, automatic renewal is a boon, since it saves the annual chore of manually renewing subscriptions to new virus definitions. Others view the policy with suspicion, especially since these policies are often not made clear at the outset. Moreover, the amount charged for the renewal each year can change, depending on the going rate for the subscription at the time of the renewal.

In order to get to the bottom of this, I bought products from each of the following four security companies to see how transparent the auto-renewal policy is and just how difficult it is to get out of the scheme once you know about it.

Windows Live OneCare is the least transparent

Of all the companies I tested, Microsoft’s all-in-one security and maintenance package, Windows Live OneCare, has the most-hidden automatic subscription-renewal policy and is the most difficult to learn how to cancel.

You begin the process by signing up for a free Windows Live account (basically a Hotmail e-mail account). At the bottom of the form is a link to the Windows Live Service Agreement, a 6,708-word document that hints at what’s to come. It reads, "If we informed you that the service will be provided indefinitely or automatically renewed, we may automatically renew your service and charge you for any renewal term."

The actual commitment isn’t made until you enter your credit-card information and are allowed to review your data before confirming the purchase. The review page shows no information on the subscription-renewal policy — that is, until you click View Details under Windows Live OneCare. Only if you open the link do you see this policy statement:
  • "You have selected a one year subscription to Windows Live OneCare … This is an annual subscription that will be automatically charged to your credit card every year at the then current price unless you cancel your account or select an alternative plan. You must agree to the Windows Live OneCare Subscription Agreement to access the service. Major credit card required. Prices subject to change. Valid in US only."
Despite the above language, no "alternative plans" are listed. Nor is any information provided on how to get out of the automatic renewal program.

After your purchase, you can go to Microsoft’s Billing and account management page and sign in with your Windows Live e-mail and password. There, you can click on the service you purchased (Windows Live OneCare) and see links for complete cancellation of the service itself. But nowhere is there information on simply canceling recurring credit-card charges.

In the end, you have to phone Windows Live OneCare Support at 866-663-2273 in order to cancel only the automatic-renewal aspect of your subscription. (I was told by a Microsoft representative that this toll-free number also can be called from outside the U.S. if international dialing and the country code 1 is used, but I wasn’t able to test this.)

McAfee embeds auto-renewal policy in EULA

A somewhat stealthy approach is taken by McAfee. As part of the online purchase process, users see a scrolling box containing a 3,280-word end-user license agreement (EULA). Buried in the scrolling text is a statement that reads:
  • "If you have agreed to permit McAfee to automatically renew your subscription to the Software by charging a valid credit card number which you have provided to McAfee, your subscription will be automatically renewed thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of the term and each anniversary thereafter for a fee no greater than McAfee’s then-current price, excluding promotional and discount pricing."
According to the license, simply purchasing with a credit card gives the company permission to automatically charge you for a subscription renewal year after year.

How do you get out of it? The EULA goes on to say:
  • "McAfee may continue charging you for any subscription automatically renewed unless you inform McAfee´s customer support department at (408) 992-8599 or (866) 622-3911 (or any other local number provided by the respective McAfee entity in your region) not to renew your subscription to the Software at least thirty (30) days prior to the expiration of your subscription to the Software and informing them of your desire not to have such subscription automatically renewed."
Granted, every customer should read the fine print before purchase. But, many would argue that this important information about ongoing charges should be made more apparent.

In case you missed the phone numbers in the EULA, you can always cancel auto-renewal of your subscription at the McAfee Web site. However, finding the right page isn’t easy, especially since the site’s search feature provides no quick answers. Here are the steps for U.S. customers:

Step 1: Go to McAfee’s main U.S. page.

Step 2: At the right end of the navigation bar near the top, click My Account.

Step 3: Log in using your e-mail address and password.

Step 4: In the navigation pane on the left, select Auto-Renewal Setup under My Account.

Step 5: Under Auto-Renewal Setup, the page should have check boxes corresponding to each product you’ve purchased. Uncheck the boxes for each item whose subscription you do not want to have renewed automatically. Then click Done.

Customers outside the United States may need to contact a customer service representative either by e-mail, phone, or online chat. These options are available at McAfee’s main customer service page.

Symantec: Mandatory auto-renewal, but easier to cancel

I found that Symantec actually has the second-best policy of the four security sites I tested. Symantec products give you no choice, requiring you to accept automatic subscription renewal as part of your purchase, but at least this is made pretty clear from the beginning. An explanation just below the credit-card form in Symantec’s online store reads, in part:
  • "By placing this order, you consent to Symantec automatically renewing your annual subscription. Symantec will notify you by e-mail prior to expiration of your current subscription … If you do not want to be automatically charged, you may discontinue the auto-renewal feature of Norton Ongoing Protection at any time after completing this order by following the instructions contained on the Symantec Web site and in the confirmation e-mail."
Despite the lack of choice, Symantec at least warns you, both at the time of purchase and in the confirmation e-mail. Moreover, it provides a link to the cancellation page, both in the online receipt and the confirmation mail.

On the chance the buyer might miss these statements, I went to Symantec’s main site to see how hard it would be to find the cancellation page on my own. I entered cancel automatic renewal in the search box at the top of the page. The search returned three results, the first of which was an Enterprise Support Knowledge Base article entitled "How to cancel On-going Protection." The article included a link to the cancellation form.

The actual cancellation process is a simple matter of filling out the form online and clicking Submit. (This only cancels auto-renewal, not your current subscription.) The only downside is that you’ll need to have your name, e-mail address, order number, product activation key, and product serial number to complete the form! So remember to save your online receipt or the confirmation e-mail you received after your purchase.

ZoneAlarm provides a fairly upfront choice

As far as security products go, Check Point’s ZoneAlarm is the least coercive when it comes to automatic subscription renewal. Unlike the other three companies I tested, the order form for ZoneAlarm provides a check box where you enter your credit-card information that reads "Automatically renew my subscription upon expiration." The box is checked by default, however, so if you miss it, you’ll be signed up for automatic charges until you cancel. And the confirmation e-mail you receive won’t clue you in to this fact.

Once you’re signed up for automatic renewal with a ZoneAlarm product, canceling the auto-renewal isn’t too difficult — providing you know where on ZoneAlarm’s site to look. I had to do a lot of clicking around to find the right page, and the site’s search function was little to no help. Here’s the solution:

Step 1: On ZoneAlarm’s main page, click Customer Support in the navigation pane on the left.

Step 2: On the Customer Service page, click Login to My Account under Customer Service. You may be prompted whether to display both secure and nonsecure items.

Step 3: On the Account Login page, enter the user ID and password you created when you purchased the product. Click Sign In Now! Again, you may be prompted whether to display both secure and nonsecure items.

Step 4: On the My Account page, click Manage Subscriptions under the Manage Subscriptions heading.

Step 5: On the Manage Subscriptions page, look in the section with the Automatic License Renewal heading. Choose Manually renew this license from the Renewal Option drop-down list. Click Submit.

What’s behind the hard-to-cancel policies?

Not surprisingly, companies that enroll customers in automatic-renewal programs by default tend to describe the policy as an advantage for customers.

A Microsoft spokeswoman explained that "the goal of implementing the automatic-renewal process was to protect customers from an interruption in their service. Recent studies show as many as two-thirds of antivirus users postpone their subscription renewal." (Microsoft policy prohibits identifying p.r. spokespeople by name.)

John Gable, director of product management for Check Point’s ZoneAlarm division, says the company’s recently implemented auto-renewal practice was intended "to help consumers keep their subscriptions up to date, as well as in response to feedback from many users who felt subscription renewal reminders were too intrusive."

Corporate altruism doesn’t seem to be the only motive in the move to recurring credit-card charges, however. Last year, an article in TechWeb credited Symantec’s then consumer-group chief Enrique Salem as saying that automatic renewal of product updates was one of several "revenue-generating" strategies to "pump up the consumer group’s bottom line." (A representative I contacted at Symantec did not provide a comment by press time.)

Consumer reaction is decidely negative

Despite the promise of continued service that automatic renewal offers, some customers clearly don’t like being signed up for recurring credit-card billing by default. It isn’t difficult to find complaints about this practice posted in online forums.

For example, a user with the screen name RideRed claimed in BroadbandReports.com that Symantec charged his credit card at renewal time without his consent, despite the fact that he had turned off automatic renewal at the time he made his purchase.

Similarly, a user of Digg.com comments:
  • "I usually don’t sign up for services that auto-renew. Why? Because I am surrounded by examples of companies that REFUSE to stop charging when the customer tells them to. They call it an ‘error’ and keep right on charging — all you can do is call and hope they eventually stop taking your money for a service you’ve long since stopped using.”
Quantifying the level of dissatisfaction is more difficult. None of the companies I was able to reach had (or would reveal) the number of customers who have canceled automatic renewal, although the Microsoft representative did say the majority of customers are auto-renewing their subscriptions.

Nevertheless, it’s safe to say most companies track customer complaints and respond when they reach a critical level. As ZoneAlarm’s John Gable acknowledges, "We are continuing to run usability testing with regards to placement of the auto-renew option and whether to keep it checked by default or not. Therefore, the way we have it today may very well change based on user feedback."

If you feel the pain, you must complain

No product I reviewed has a completely clean record. ZoneAlarm, to its credit, actually does allow users to opt out of automatic renewal before completing a purchase (but opting out is not the default choice). Symantec, for its part, does make its auto-renewal process apparent and relatively easy to turn off — compared with the worst cases.

I’m the first to agree that the ability to automatically renew a subscription, especially to an important security service, is a convenience most customers should consider. But to compel customers to adopt automatic charges and then hide or obscure that fact is quite another matter. Security companies compound the problem by making the cancellation process difficult and hard to find. In most cases, companies are implementing this policy in every country where they can lawfully do so.

Microsoft’s spokeswoman told me that the company "has taken steps to prevent their customers from being surprised by automatic renewals. Sign-up forms make it clear that online customers are entering an automatic-renewal program."

But this is in direct contradiction to my own purchasing experience. It may come as a surprise to Microsoft that not everyone clicks every link to read the fine print during their online shopping experiences.

Although the companies I surveyed send out reminders before the renewal fee is charged, customers can easily lose track of these notices in the deluge of spam and business promotions they receive each day.

Corporations seldom change policies that make them rich, unless enough customers complain. If automatic renewal works for you, then by all means keep the service going. But, if you don’t like the way it’s been implemented by your security provider, it’s time to let them know.

Scott Dunn is associate editor of the Windows Secrets Newsletter. He is also a contributing editor of PC World Magazine, where he has written a monthly column since 1992, and co-author of 101 Windows Tips & Tricks (Peachpit) with Jesse Berst and Charles Bermant.

 
Known Issues

What code signing is and isn’t good for


By Scott Dunn

As I explained in my May 10 article, driver-signing requirements for the 64-bit version of Vista have slowed down developers, but not hackers.

Readers wrote in, pointing out further complications, while cautioning that the practice of driver signing itself is still useful.

Code signing is valuable, despite flaws

Regarding my story on Microsoft’s driver-signing strategy for Windows Vista, reader Donald P. Welker writes:
  • "I’m afraid your FUD [fear, uncertainty, and doubt] may be even more dangerous than Microsoft’s. There is no basis for trusting a vendor-supplied (or worse, downloaded) binary without code signing. While Microsoft clearly deserves your indictment of their shortcomings, your article overlooks the fact that third-party antimalware products can also examine code signatures and prevent installation and/or execution on that basis.

    "Since it seems unlikely that we’re going to force Microsoft into an open-source model, we have no choice but to accept a code-signing model and start signing our code. If there’s a real Achilles heel in code signing, it would be the allowance of file-based certificates instead of mandatory use of smart cards or similar tamper-resistant tokens. Besides, signing open-source code is a good idea anyway."
Just to clarify, it was not and is not my intention to say that driver signing is a bad idea, or that it should be abandoned. On the contrary, in light of the constant security and malware threats users face, a multipronged approach to security only makes sense.

The point of the article was that the specific

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Wacky Web Week

Practice your bunny-surgery skills online

image If you’ve ever wanted be a surgeon, you’ve probably realized that your first attempts should be on something safe — for example, on a stuffed bunny. Now, you can do just that, without ever hurting the bunny!

This Flash-based game is a demonstration of the services offered by 10mg Interactive of Amsterdam. It lets you resuscitate a dead bunny, then shave and operate, saving its life — if you can. But, you may find surgery is harder than you thought. Even virtual surgery!
Play the game

 
Known Issues

The reality of Microsoft’s signed-drivers policy

By Scott Dunn

Vista’s 64-bit signed-driver debacle leads one reader to despair of Microsoft ever learning.

Will customer protests of Redmond’s approach lead the situation to be improved, or is this a case in which a mistake is set in stone?

Microsoft does what it wants

Referring to my admonition on driver signing in the closing comments of my May 10 article, reader Dan Topper doubts that anything will change:

  • "While I agree with what you have written about ‘signed drivers,’ I also know that Microsoft has a history of doing what it wants. Since it is almost impossible to apply economic pressure to Microsoft to do better, this too will become a fact of life to deal with. The best example I can think of to demonstrate this principle is Microsoft’s abominable attempts at security. Would you argue that their doing something is better than nothing? I say they have a history of doing nothing in some regards, and it is up to the users to protect themselves (let the buyer beware). Microsoft has demonstrated how resistant they are to change in many ways."
Microsoft wants to sell its product as much as any manufacturer. If the lack of available drivers is slowing down Vista’s acceptance, Microsoft will take notice. But, as you say, the bottom line for consumers is to do their homework before they buy or download any software product that doesn’t fully meet their requirements.

Toward a deeper understanding of DEP

Referring to my May 3 article on Data Execution Prevention (DEP), reader John Leslie provides a corrective description of how DEP actually works:
  • "I presume lots of people told you your description of DEP is nonsense? Nothing to do with data on disk. It’s marking pages that aren’t used for ‘code.’ A common hack is to overflow a buffer in a stack segment to 1.) add malicious code and, 2.) put the address of that code as the return address to the current function (by overwriting the original). DEP marks pages used for stack as non-executable so, if this fails, the application dies with a DEP error. It can’t continue, as it lost the next address."
Actually, John, you’re the only one who pointed this out. But, thanks for the information!

Adobe places few restrictions on educational versions

The May 3 issue also discussed restrictions on academic software sold by Adobe, which acquired Macromedia in 2005 and still sells products under that brand. Reader Michael Sullivan makes some cogent observations on this topic:
  • "Regarding academic licensing, you note that in the past Adobe has not imposed limits on use of its software purchased pursuant to its academic licensing scheme, while Macromedia has barred commercial use and puts a logo on the screen to ensure that. You suggest that Adobe’s acquisition of Macromedia will likely change the latter. That doesn’t appear to be the case. Adobe appears to be continuing the existing academic licensing policies applicable to its own, and the former Macromedia, software.

    "The EULA in my copy of the newly released Adobe Photoshop CS3, for example, does not restrict academic-licensed usage to noncommercial. But, the license agreements for the former Macromedia products posted on the Adobe website do restrict commercial use of academic licenses. A PDF version of the EULA for Creative Suite CS3 (various versions of which contain both Adobe and former Macromedia products) posted on Adobe’s EULA list, however, seems to be the same as the version included with Photoshop CS3 in not restricting commercial use.

    "Adobe has not updated its EULA list to provide access to agreements applicable to the CS3 versions of each individual product. I think that the more liberal CS3 EULA applies to, say, Dreamweaver CS3, but there is no way to tell for sure without buying it."

I have examined the Dreamweaver CS3 license, and I don’t see that it places any substantial restrictions on the educational version. The only requirement is that a version purchased using an educational discount must be used by a qualified educational end user. I hope this clears things up.



This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Woody's Windows

Windows Home Server looks like a winner

Woody leonhard By Woody Leonhard

As a card-carrying member of the ‘Association of Windows Victims,’ I never believe Microsoft’s hype about software that’s still sitting in the hopper.

But I’ve been playing with the beta version of Windows Home Server for quite a while, and even though the final product isn’t due out until the end of the year, I’m impressed.


Not another Windows Server, puh-lease

When I first heard that Microsoft was working on a version of Windows Server that’s dumbed down to be used by mere mortals, I let out a groan. Literally. Years ago, that was the original premise behind Windows Small Business Server — a version of Windows Server for people who don’t wear white lab coats.

I don’t want to burst any bubbles here, but if you think that the typical Windows user can handle Small Business Server (SBS) solo, you’ve been drinking too much Kool-Aid. I worked on the first beta versions of SBS, and I carry the emotional scars to prove it.

Why in the world, I wondered out loud, would Microsoft slash away at Windows Server again, this time trying to convince folks that a typical home user could make heads or tails of it? I mean, installing Exchange Server on your home network is like parking the QE2 in your driveway. The average home user needs Windows Server (and its ubiquitous security holes) like a jogger needs a wheelbarrow.

So it was with great trepidation, and more than a little skepticism, that I installed an early beta of Windows Home Server on my own home network. I came away more than a little amazed. If you haven’t heard much about WHS yet, you will. If you don’t think you could possibly use a version of Windows Server in your home, you may change your tune when you see what it does — and what it doesn’t.

The six pillars of WHS

Forget for a moment that Windows Home Server is based on Windows Server. That will put you in the right mindset. Think of the WHS computer as a black box that you plug into your network’s router and promptly forget. No monitor. No keyboard. No Active Directory with LDAP attribute objects that keep you on the phone with your network consultant at a hundred bucks an hour, or pulling out your hair for hours on end. Just a box.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Perimeter Scan

Microsoft launches new security products

Ryan russell By Ryan Russell

I attended Microsoft’s ForeFront and Systems Center launch event on May 2 for the Redmond company’s new security and management products.

As you know, I work for a company that sells products in these areas, and I’m not performing a review, but I do want to present to you some of the information I gathered.


ForeFront Security 2007 centralizes MS antimalware

Microsoft has several products now in its Enterprise Security arsenal. These include ForeFront Security for Exchange Server, ForeFront Security for SharePoint, and ForeFront Client Security. The ForeFront brands encompass Microsoft’s antivirus (AV) and antispyware technologies.

Both ForeFront for Exchange and ForeFront for SharePoint are server-based solutions. In both cases, Microsoft claims that they are designed with these particular servers in mind. I’ve heard horror stories in the past about ordinary AV products detecting a virus inside the monolithic Exchange message store, and deleting the whole file. Microsoft says that because of the design, its product is more accurate and performs better.

The most interesting thing I heard about the ForeFront server products is that Microsoft has licensed eight different AV engines from various vendors and has them running under a unified management interface and update procedure. At any given time, you can pick up to five engines to scan information on the server. Microsoft claims that this gives you broader and quicker coverage for new malware threats.

The ForeFront for Client Security product is a different engine and set of AV signatures, developed in-house at Microsoft. One presenter said that Microsoft has spent "a couple hundred million dollars" developing its own engine, signatures, and workforce for its client products.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

The Windows Secrets Newsletter is published weekly on the 1st through 4th Thursdays of each month, plus occasional news updates. We skip an issue on the 5th Thursday of any month, the week of Thanksgiving, and the last two weeks of August and December. Windows Secrets is a continuation of four merged publications: Brian's Buzz on Windows and Woody's Windows Watch in 2004, the LangaList in 2006, and the Support Alert Newsletter in 2008.

Publisher: WindowsSecrets.com, 1218 Third Ave., Suite 1515, Seattle, WA 98101 USA. Vendors, please send no unsolicited packages to this address (readers' letters are fine).

Editor in chief: Tracey Capen. Senior editors: Fred Langa, Woody Leonhard. Copyeditor: Roberta Scholz. Program director: Tony Johnston. Contributing editors: Yardena Arar, Susan Bradley, Scott Dunn, Michael Lasky, Scott Mace, Ryan Russell, Lincoln Spector, Robert Vamosi, Becky Waring. Product manager: Andy Boyd. Advertising director: Eric Gilley.

Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, Support Alert, LangaList, LangaList Plus, WinFind, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of WindowsSecrets.com. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: Anyone may subscribe to this newsletter by visiting our free signup page.

WE GUARANTEE YOUR PRIVACY:

1. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever.
2. We will never send you any unrequested e-mail, besides newsletter updates.
3. All unsubscribe requests are honored immediately, period.  Privacy policy

HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: To unsubscribe from the Windows Secrets Newsletter,
  • Visit our Unsubscribe page.
Copyright © 2012 by WindowsSecrets.com. All rights reserved.

Table of contents

Top-scoring articles in the past 12 months
  • Leaving long cookie trails throughout the Web 5.00
  • Windows-like security for Android devices 5.00
  • Win7′s no-reformat, nondestructive reinstall 4.53
  • The sorry tale of the (un)Secure Sockets Layer 4.42
  • RPV: Win7′s least-known data-protection system 4.33
  • Recovery: the last step in total data security 4.30
  • Time for a .NET update we can’t ignore 4.30
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 1 4.25
  • Revising printing habits saves money and trees 4.25
  • Upgrades end in erratic, partial hangs 4.25
  • Pros and cons of a ‘keyfile’ password 4.21
  • Office 2007 gets its final service pack 4.19
  • Putting Registry-/system-cleanup apps to the test 4.19
  • Beating back Duku and a plethora of other threats 4.19
  • One year and 99 security bulletins later 4.18
  • 1.8TB external drive goes down hard 4.17
  • Don’t pay for software you don’t need — Part 3 4.16
  • Internet Explorer gets another round of patches 4.15
  • Is your free AV tool a ‘resource pig?’ 4.15
  • Vacation’s over; it’s a big round of patches 4.15
  • Remote access leads to remote attacks 4.15
  • Keeping you up to date: say no to .NET — again 4.14
  • Take control of Google’s privacy policy settings 4.14
  • Office File Validation patch leads to problems 4.14
  • The advanced system-recover toolkit 4.13
  • New “419″ scam involves PayPal and Western Union 4.12
  • Readers’ best personal-privacy tips 4.11
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 2 4.11
  • Re-examining Dropbox and its alternatives 4.10
  • Easily edit Windows’ right-click context menus 4.09
Connect with us Follow us on Twitter Connect with us on Facebook View our RSS Feeds
  • Home|
  • Newsletter|
  • About Windows Secrets|
  • Advertise with us|
  • Unsubscribe|
  • Sitemap|
  • Affiliates|
Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, WinFind, Windows Gizmos, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of iNET Interactive. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.
iNET Interactive Copyright © 2011 iNET Interactive.
All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy
Internet Services
  • Web Hosting Talk
  • HostingCon
  • Hosting Catalog
  • Host Voice
Web Development
  • Hot Scripts
  • DB Forums
Digital Marketing
  • ABestWeb
  • Search Marketing Standard
  • PayPerClickUniverse
  • SEMCompare
Consumer Tech
  • Windows Secrets
  • Overclockers
  • Mac Forums

Learn more about
advertising opportunities across the iNET Interactive Network.

LiquidWeb