Windows Secrets

Subscribers: Sign in

Enter your e-mail address to get a free subscription.
We guarantee your privacy
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Newsletter Archives
    • Current
    • LangaList Plus
    • Patch Watch
    • Wacky Web Week
    • Security Baseline
  • E-Books
  • Lounge
  • About us
    • Refunds
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Your Account
    • Upgrade
    • Preferences
    • Bonus Download
    • Unsubscribe
Home>Readers respond on controlling reboots

Windows Secrets Newsletter • Issue 71 • 2006-03-16 • Circulation: over 400,000


Table of contents 
  • Top Story: Readers respond on controlling reboots
  • Woody's Windows: Vista 5308: through a glass, darkly
  • Perimeter Scan: Perfect your patch process
  • Over the Horizon: Windows flaws from server to client
  • Patch Watch: More than just two patches this week

 
Top Story

Readers respond on controlling reboots

By Brian Livingston

Patching Windows is good, and rebooting right after you’ve patched is good, too. But if you’re right in the middle of something, seeing Windows reboot when you didn’t expect it can be very bad.

My top story on Mar. 2 revealed several little-known settings you can use to control how often Windows reminds you to reboot after installing patches — or whether you want any reminders at all. The problem is that, by default, Windows reminds you every 10 minutes. And, if you happen to be typing in some application and you press the N key when the reminder window pops up, you’ve launched Windows’ Restart Now option. There’s no way out of it.

I want to re-emphasize the importance of rebooting before and after installing patches. I’ve heard warnings about the way patches can leave Windows in an “unstable state” until it’s rebooted. (No one’s given me any verifiable examples of this, though.)

Having said that it’s important to reboot, it’s also true that unexpected reboots are simply unacceptable. Microsoft should never have programmed the reboot-reminder dialog box (see illustration) to grab the keyboard focus and launch instantly from an accidental key press. Clicking the Restart Now button with a mouse, or pressing Alt+N, should be the only ways the reboot process gets kicked off.

If it’s so important for a PC to be rebooted before and after patches are applied, Microsoft should make this a requirement for every such patch. Windows users should be informed that their applications must be closed before patching begins, so no work is lost.

By the same token, if a user is so deeply involved in a project that Restart Later is his or her choice, the operating system must absolutely respect that choice. Patching to defend against a Windows security hole is a great idea, but it’s not worth losing all the windows you may have had open on your busy Desktop.

This is why I revealed in the last issue several settings you can change to specify how often the reboot reminder pops up after patches are installed. As always, my readers have even more ideas about how you can take control of the reboot process. Let’s get started, shall we?

Remote Desktop causes unexpected restarts

Tony Hunt found that Windows itself isn’t the only culprit in rebooting your PC without adequate warning:
  • “I recently discovered another way in which Automatic Update causes a machine to reboot. When I disconnected a Remote Desktop session on Windows Server 2003, my session was logged off the machine and Windows Update decided that it was time to reboot as there was now nobody logged in to it. That was a production server running our organization’s main SQL database!

    “Needless to say, we will be very careful about even installing updates on our servers in the future.”
Windows servers are a special case, demanding rigorous testing before you install patches. This is one reason why we always publish a Windows Secrets Newsletter only two days after Microsoft’s regular Patch Tuesday schedule — so we can tell you about any side-effects of the latest patches. (See the Patch Watch and Over the Horizon columns in our paid version.) Obviously, however, Windows isn’t the only program that can reboot, and you must pay heed to them all.

Symantec Ghost triggers reboots, too

Many products that automatically update themselves request (or require) a reboot to complete their installation processes. Regardless of the trigger, the end user usually does play a role in the process.

Brian Harder, who works in a health-care organization, reports that unexpected reboots affected his users’ Great Plains Dynamics billing applications built on Microsoft’s SQL Server:
  • “What triggered the user’s PC to reboot in the first place? A software push from Symantec’s Ghost product for a completely unrelated third-party product. Ghost triggers reboots automatically, but only if Ghost determines that it is needed. In addition, there is typically a warning window and countdown when the software delivery is taking place. It, too, is modal and clearly warns the user to close other applications.

    “The trick is, the warning window sometimes ‘freaks out’ the end users and they panic. Rather than following the Ghost message, they stop using their computer altogether until the PC reboots automatically and the messages stop.

    “In addition, the Ghost warning messages are set for ‘Always on Top’ and do not contain the Minimize button most users expect. The correct action is to simply click away from the warning window and do what you need to do. However, for a naïve or inexperienced user, this is just a bit too easy to get wrong.

    “This isn’t just a technology problem. Human factors wind up playing a major role. We warn our users about upcoming Ghost software pushes. However, you can’t know that they saw the messages or understood them. The Ghost warning messages can be experienced, from a user’s perspective, as a jarring and unexpected intrusion. It’s a factor out of their control and they know it.

    “We ask users to contact us if they don’t understand, but they almost never do. I think many users are afraid of asking questions for fear of looking ‘dumb’. So we do the best we can, but in the end there’s a task to be done and a timeframe for it to be done in.”
Now that many applications grab your Internet connection to update themselves, there must be scores of ways a reboot sequence could be initiated. Do I have a list of all such apps? Nope. You’ll just have to keep your eyes peeled.

How to schedule reboots on stand-alone PCs

In my Mar. 2 article, I described how to completely disable reboot reminders or, preferably, re-schedule them to occur every 12 hours, so (if you forget to reboot) you’ll see a reminder the next morning, when you’re not actively typing. I explained the procedure for users of Windows Server Update Services (WSUS), a free Microsoft program for distributing patches. But reader Charles Little offers a way XP Pro users can re-schedule the reminders without WSUS:
  • “In gpedit.msc, navigate to Computer Configuration, Administrative Template, Windows Components, Windows Update. In that screen, select Re-prompt for restart with scheduled installations. Open this, click Enabled, and then set the time interval in the same dialog.”
We haven’t yet found a way to control this on XP Home machines. You should also be aware that an IT administrator can restrict the use of the Group Policy editor (gpedit.msc) by individual XP Pro users. In that case, the above trick won’t work.

Use Task Scheduler for planned reboots

Andy Helsby recommends a way to make patch-install reboots fairly painless — even when you can’t physically be present at a server that needs rebooting:
  • “I have a couple of sites where I don’t have remote access to the server out of hours but also need to install patches and reboot out of hours.

    “I install the patches as late as I can in the day, normally after most people have gone home. At this point, the reminders start appearing, but I can’t reboot the server as I still have people on it.

    “I know I can reboot either tonight or the following night, so I schedule a reboot using Task Scheduler or at the command line (the latter is my personal preference). I then stop the Automatic Updates service on the server.

    “The notifications stop and the ‘shield warning’ icon disappears. When the server reboots, the service is automatically restarted.

    “As Microsoft only releases patches on a monthly basis, I can be reasonably certain that I am not going to miss a new automatic update between now and the scheduled reboot of the server.

    “Note that I only do this for servers that I can’t immediately reboot and that I am fairly sure won’t have major problems if I install a patch and don’t immediately reboot.”
Readers Hunt, Harder, Little, and Helsby will receive gift certificates for a book, CD, or DVD of their choice for sending us comments that we printed.

To send us more information about controlling the Windows patch-reboot process, or to send us a tip on any other subject, visit WindowsSecrets.com/contact.

Brian Livingston is editor of the Windows Secrets Newsletter and the coauthor of Windows 2000 Secrets, Windows Me Secrets, and eight other books.

 
Woody's Windows

Vista 5308: through a glass, darkly

Woody leonhardI’ve spent most of the past three weeks slogging through the “February Community Technology Preview” of the next version of Windows — Vista Build 5308, to the tech-savvy.

For the first time in a very, very long time, I’m excited about a new product from Microsoft. Vista holds tremendous promise. Whether the final product will live up to the promise, though, is anyone’s guess.

Sifting through the versions

No doubt you’ve read about the eight — count ‘em, eight — different versions of Vista that Microsoft Marketeers have on tap.

Most people need only concern themselves with four versions. Microsoft hasn’t set the features in stone, but at this point it appears that we’re going to see:

• Vista Home Basic, a truly bare-bones Windows with no Media Center capabilities, no DVD burning, no network backup, and a stripped-down user interface (the new Aero Glass user interface only works on relatively powerful video cards anyway);

• Vista Home Premium, destined to be the version of choice for home users, with Media Center, DVD burning, backup, auxiliary display support, and the full Aero Glass razzle-dazzle;

• Vista Business, with Aero Glass, Remote Desktop, P2P Meeting capabilities, and full domain support, but (apparently) without Media Center;

• Vista Ultimate, a superset of all the versions.

Regarding the other versions, Windows Vista Starter targets emerging markets with a hamstrung version that’s an embarrassment to Microsoft and condescending to developing countries. Don’t get me started. Home “N” and Business “N” drop Windows Media Player, in conformance with legal obligations in the European Union, and should sell about 10 copies each.

There’s more on the differences between all the Vista versions at Microsoft’s announcement page, Paul Thurrott’s SuperSite for Windows, and Ed Bott’s ZDNet blog.

Those of you who make decisions about implementing Vista across an enterprise will find that your options are quite limited, really. You’ll probably end up with the licensing plan known as Software Assurance sooner or later. That’s the only reasonable way you can get the security and deployment options available in the Business-plus edition, Vista Enterprise. Yes, you can buy into Vista Ultimate, but it’s gonna cost a pretty penny. Or kopeck.

I’ve suffered through many Microsoft betas over the years. I realize that Vista’s still in the early stages — not yet Beta 2 at this point, in spite of the Microsoft bafflegab. But a handful of things bug me about Build 5308. Pardon me while I vent a spleen — and raise a few red flags that may prove to be important to you when Vista ships late this year.

What you see — and what we’ll get

Microsoft hasn’t yet released a list of new features. Paul’s SuperSite review includes a matrix of some features, and pegs where they’ll fall in the eight-product lineup. But there’s no official list as yet, and that worries me. Why? Because Longhorn lost a whole lotta features before it became Vista. I’m worried that even more Vista features will vanish as time grows short.

Conversely, several features that I expected to see in Build 5308 aren’t there. I wonder if they’ve already dropped off the radar, or if they’ve proved so unwieldy the ‘Softies won’t be able to make them work well before Vista goes gold.

Let me give you a few examples.

Virtual folders morph into saved searches

Back when Longhorn was Longhorn and bulls charged the corridors on the MS campus, many of us anticipated a new file system called WinFS. We never knew what WinFS would do, really, but the concept seemed tantalizing: bring advanced database capabilities to Windows’ creaky NTFS file system. Several wild-eyed gauchos (present company included) thought that WinFS would finally make it easy to store, organize, manipulate and, most of all, find the files we needed when we needed them.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Perimeter Scan

Perfect your patch process

Ryan russellIf you’re responsible for more computers than you can personally lay hands on in a short period of time, then you probably have a patching process that includes some kind of cost/benefit analysis. This doesn’t necessarily require a spreadsheet with salaries and downtime costs. It can be as simple as answering the question, “How much trouble am I in if I crash the server in the middle of the day?”

The answer to that last question is probably, “I guess I’ll be staying late, and applying the patches after everyone goes home.

That’s a perfectly acceptable strategy — if you can get all the machines done manually in a reasonable amount of time. But it doesn’t scale well at all.

I’d like to present some tips that I’ve learned to make your life easier when dealing with patches and updates. Most of these tips come from my co-moderation of the patchmanagement.org mailing lists, and my job at BigFix, a company that sells a patch-management product.

Fully automatic, or semi-auto?

One topic that comes up frequently is whether anyone trusts fully-automatic patching. Sure I do, in the right circumstances.

For friends’ and families’ computers, I always enable Automatic Updates, if they have a version of Windows that supports it (Windows 2000 and later). The reason is that the risk of a malware infection is far higher than a bad patch taking out their machine. When and if it does happen, I don’t expect a bad patch to trash all the computers out there. Probably just one or two. And then I’ll go out and fix it, if it was that bad.

So far, my luck has been good. I can recall only one instance of having to fix something over the phone, out of maybe 20-odd machines I help maintain of this type for home users.

I have no illusions that problems never happen; I hear enough horror stories on the patch-management mailing lists. But that’s from users who usually have a large population of machines, so their chances of having at least one problem are much higher. Plus, they often have a fleet of similar machines, and end up with the “lucky” combination of software or hardware, and the patch affects 100 machines at once. That’s when having a good set of test machines is very helpful.

Even then, most admins don’t recommend auto-patching of your servers or other important machines. This is a simple matter of how many users are affected in case problems arise.

Consensus: Home computers, auto-patch. Work (desktop) computers, sometimes. Servers, never. Usually you want to have an opportunity to patch a test population first, and roll out patches under administrative control. For servers, you definitely want full administrative control and scheduling.

Antivirus apps firing out of control

There’s at least one piece of software at most companies that does a full auto-update more often than not. I’m talking about your antivirus software. (I’m using the term “antivirus” here rather broadly to refer to a number of anti-malware tools.) If patches need to be tested, why do we so often trust AV to auto-update?

Users tend to trust any piece of technology until they get bitten. Well, this may be the year that changes people’s minds about AV software being left to run on autopilot.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Over the Horizon

Windows flaws from server to client

Chris mosby We all know that using a computer is a dangerous business these days. Design flaws and vulnerabilities can come from anywhere, from any server, all the way down to the client accessing it — and everywhere in-between.

The best we can do these days is to be aware of what is out there, protect your computer as best you can, and practice safe computing practices. The only thing else you can do is hope that a hacker doesn’t think you’re a tempting target.

IIS can help hackers break in

The SecurityFocus site recently reported a design error in Microsoft Internet Information Server (IIS) 4 through 5.1 that was first discovered by David Litchfield. This flaw can allow a hacker to determine what IIS authentication methods are enabled by inspecting error messages that are returned. This can be accomplished even if anonymous access is enabled.

Depending on the type of authentication method the IIS server uses, a hacker could determine information like the internal network IP address of the server, the NetBIOS name, or even the name of the Windows domain the server is located in. With this information, a hacker can then make a more intelligent attack on an IIS server, knowing where to focus for a better chance of success.

What to do: Microsoft has been notified of this but does not consider it a problem. Mr. Litchfield suggests simply disabling Basic and Integrated Windows authentication on your IIS server, if it isn’t needed.

If that isn’t possible, setting account lockout policies on your server will help mitigate the risk, especially in the case of a brute force attack on system accounts. Renaming the administrator account on the server is also a good idea, and is usually considered a best practice anyway.

Visual Studio flaw could threaten developers

SecurityFocus has also recently posted information on a buffer-overflow vulnerability. This allows hackers to construct infected Microsoft Visual Studio DBP or SLN project files that will run with the privileges of the user who opens it.

This will work both locally and remotely, as long as a vulnerable version of Visual Studio is installed. So far Visual Studio 6 — both Enterprise and Professional, or as part of Microsoft Visual Interdev — has been determined to be vulnerable. But other versions of Visual Studio may also be affected.

This might not sound like too big of a deal. But just think about infected code getting into a big software maker’s new product and shipped before it was found. In the right situation, it could be devastating to a lot of people.

For more information, please read Secunia’s advisory.

What to do: While we wait for a patch for this from Microsoft, the most obvious thing to do is to just not open any Visual Project files that you’re not expecting from trusted associates. If you really want to be safe, only open your own. Securing your own code from being modified by others without your consent would be a good idea as well. That might sound extreme, but better safe than sorry.

IE issue with Java applets causes DoS

SecurityFocus also published this week information on a problem in IE’s Java applet-handling engine. This can allow a denial-of-service (DoS) attack on the browser. IE fails to handle certain conditions in the execution of Java applets in the right manner.

This only happens when Sun’s Java runtime environment is installed and is configured to be the handler of Java applets in IE. Considering Microsoft’s eventual drop of support for the Microsoft Java Virtual Machine (MSJVM), this is going to be the case more and more frequently.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Patch Watch

More than just two patches this week

Susan bradley The bulletins came to my inbox. Two patches. One for Office, one for DACLs. (What’s a DACL?) But that isn’t all. Microsoft Update has a few more patches it wants me to install.

In addition to the ever-present Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool for March (KB 890830), and the monthly update for the Outlook 2003 Junk E-Mail Filter (KB 913161), we have a few other patches in Microsoft Update’s “high priority patches” list. It reminds me that it’s not just security patches that are up there in the top section.

MS06-012 (905413)
Will Office patches prevent the next worm?

Our first patch should have us “beancounters” in a bit of a patching frenzy, as it affects our main “database” program: Excel. And not just Excel on our desktops, but in spreadsheets that can be hosted on any Web site via a “viewer” file.

Thus, browsing on the Web could be enough to cause damage. Already the pundits are discussing whether this will cause “drive-by downloads” of malware, as described by CMPnetAsia.

The interesting thing about MS06-012 (905413) is that it reportedly includes a patch for a bug that was once offered up on eBay before it was yanked by that company back in December.

I went to Microsoft Update expecting just this Excel patch to be installed on my test system. Instead, I was prompted to install KB 913471 for Office XP to fix spelling issues in languages that I don’t speak.

It then prompted me to install KB 905754 for Word 2002, KB 905758 for Powerpoint 2002, KB 905755 for Excel 2002, KB 905649 for Outlook, and finally, KB 905756 for Excel 2003.

This is one of Redmond’s “mondo issue patches” where not one, not two, but six security issues are being fixed. It points out that, on my test system, I seriously need to go through the Add/Remove Programs control panel and uninstall the old versions of Office that I thought I no longer had. I’ll then run the Windows Installer CleanUp Utility at KB 290301 to completely clean out the old files.

Examining the patches for known issues found by Microsoft ahead of time, it was interesting to see the number of performance fixes that have been rolled up into these security patches. So far the only issues noted in these patches are install issues. A good source of information to troubleshoot these kinds of problems is KB 906602.

MS06-011 (914798)
DACLs may raise your hackles

A few weeks back, a security advisory was released regarding the default permissions on certain services used in your machine. This involves DACLs (discretionary access control lists). If you’re currently running anything other than Windows XP SP1 or Windows 2003 with no service pack, you can skip these patch details completely, as you are not affected.

I could tell you to review KB 914758, which indicates that MS06-011 is a one-way, uninstallable patch. It also reverts the patches machine back to its default permissions.

But it might be easier for you to finally get around to installing SP2 on your XP boxes and SP1 on your Window 2003 machines. If your software vendors have certified you on these platforms, it’s better in the long run, anyway.

Outlook patch fixes MS06-003 problem

I tend to think that the upper section of Microsoft Update is “just” security patches. But this week, it’s obvious that it also includes patches deemed to fix performance issues.

Along with KB 913471, described above (which corrects Office XP spelling issues), and the usual updated Outlook Junk Mail Filter (which resets your default e-mail client to Outlook), this month also includes KB 913807. This fixes an MS06-003 problem that conflicts with Visual Basic programs. I previously discussed MS06-003 in my Jan. 12 column. The problem the patch fixes is further described in Alun Jones’s blog.


ISA 2004 SP2 hotfix corrects Web access

In my Mar. 2 Patch Watch column, I reported that ISA 2004 SP2 was not properly handling Web sites like Delta.com, Sun.com, and iTunes. At that time, the only fix we had was to uninstall SP2. Unless you had updated to Installer 3.0, this meant some hazards of uninstallation in the process.

Now there’s a hotfix available. KB 915045, as discussed in Thomas Shinder’s blog, is available by calling Microsoft Product Support Services. (See the PSS support page for numbers.) KB 915045 is not a public article at this time.

The real issue is not with the service pack, but the Web coding practices of these sites. This is described in detail in Shinder’s explanation.

Support hours extended for Old World admins

If you called the IT Professional support line in the last couple of days, you found that you got a slightly different message. The message indicated that normal support hours were Monday through Friday, 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. Pacific time, and that after-hours business critical support was available at later times.

On March 13, Microsoft made the world a little flatter by extending its support hours in an announcement. Previously, only the U.S. and Canada had 24/7 support at a rate of $245. Everyone else around the world was dependent on the business hours and practices of their local offices. So if it was 6 p.m. in Perth, your Microsoft engineer had no obligation to stick around and help you. You were stuck until morning.

Now, any business-critical event can get support. There’s a price to pay: the rate doubles for off-hour coverage. If you have MS’s Software Assurance license, review your agreement. You may have access to support calls under that plan, as well.

What’s not changing is the ability for IT professionals to obtain hotfixes at the usual phone number. Even if it’s not necessarily a “business-critical” down situation, the hotfix is still available, as usual, for free.

The engineer taking the call will remind you that the hotfix has not been “regression tested.” So be sure to install it on a test machine first. But if you know the hotfix by its Knowledge Base article number, it’s still relatively easy to obtain it — even with the change in support for North America. What the change does do is acknowledge that both software sales and support are needed worldwide.

Hotmail patch for IE7 beta is troubling

A disturbing trend for me is the increasing push to put beta software on our systems. While there are parts of Google and Windows Live that have “beta” nearly permanently engraved onto their pages, because they’re Web sites you’re not installing software on your systems.

In Microsoft Update’s middle section of patches, the optional software section, there’s a sign that we’re putting too much beta code on real live systems. KB 904942 is a patch to fix an issue with authentication to certain sites like Hotmail after the beta for Internet Explorer 7 is installed.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

The Windows Secrets Newsletter is published weekly on the 1st through 4th Thursdays of each month, plus occasional news updates. We skip an issue on the 5th Thursday of any month, the week of Thanksgiving, and the last two weeks of August and December. Windows Secrets is a continuation of four merged publications: Brian's Buzz on Windows and Woody's Windows Watch in 2004, the LangaList in 2006, and the Support Alert Newsletter in 2008.

Publisher: WindowsSecrets.com, 1218 Third Ave., Suite 1515, Seattle, WA 98101 USA. Vendors, please send no unsolicited packages to this address (readers' letters are fine).

Editor in chief: Tracey Capen. Senior editors: Fred Langa, Woody Leonhard. Copyeditor: Roberta Scholz. Program director: Tony Johnston. Contributing editors: Yardena Arar, Susan Bradley, Scott Dunn, Michael Lasky, Scott Mace, Ryan Russell, Lincoln Spector, Robert Vamosi, Becky Waring. Product manager: Andy Boyd. Advertising director: Eric Gilley.

Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, Support Alert, LangaList, LangaList Plus, WinFind, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of WindowsSecrets.com. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: Anyone may subscribe to this newsletter by visiting our free signup page.

WE GUARANTEE YOUR PRIVACY:

1. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever.
2. We will never send you any unrequested e-mail, besides newsletter updates.
3. All unsubscribe requests are honored immediately, period.  Privacy policy

HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: To unsubscribe from the Windows Secrets Newsletter,
  • Visit our Unsubscribe page.
Copyright © 2012 by WindowsSecrets.com. All rights reserved.

Table of contents

Top-scoring articles in the past 12 months
  • Leaving long cookie trails throughout the Web 5.00
  • Windows-like security for Android devices 5.00
  • Win7′s no-reformat, nondestructive reinstall 4.53
  • The sorry tale of the (un)Secure Sockets Layer 4.42
  • RPV: Win7′s least-known data-protection system 4.33
  • Recovery: the last step in total data security 4.30
  • Time for a .NET update we can’t ignore 4.30
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 1 4.25
  • Revising printing habits saves money and trees 4.25
  • Upgrades end in erratic, partial hangs 4.25
  • Pros and cons of a ‘keyfile’ password 4.21
  • Office 2007 gets its final service pack 4.19
  • Putting Registry-/system-cleanup apps to the test 4.19
  • Beating back Duku and a plethora of other threats 4.19
  • One year and 99 security bulletins later 4.18
  • 1.8TB external drive goes down hard 4.17
  • Don’t pay for software you don’t need — Part 3 4.16
  • Internet Explorer gets another round of patches 4.15
  • Is your free AV tool a ‘resource pig?’ 4.15
  • Vacation’s over; it’s a big round of patches 4.15
  • Remote access leads to remote attacks 4.15
  • Keeping you up to date: say no to .NET — again 4.14
  • Take control of Google’s privacy policy settings 4.14
  • Office File Validation patch leads to problems 4.14
  • The advanced system-recover toolkit 4.13
  • New “419″ scam involves PayPal and Western Union 4.12
  • Readers’ best personal-privacy tips 4.11
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 2 4.11
  • Re-examining Dropbox and its alternatives 4.10
  • Easily edit Windows’ right-click context menus 4.09
Connect with us Follow us on Twitter Connect with us on Facebook View our RSS Feeds
  • Home|
  • Newsletter|
  • About Windows Secrets|
  • Advertise with us|
  • Unsubscribe|
  • Sitemap|
  • Affiliates|
Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, WinFind, Windows Gizmos, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of iNET Interactive. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.
iNET Interactive Copyright © 2011 iNET Interactive.
All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy
Internet Services
  • Web Hosting Talk
  • HostingCon
  • Hosting Catalog
  • Host Voice
Web Development
  • Hot Scripts
  • DB Forums
Digital Marketing
  • ABestWeb
  • Search Marketing Standard
  • PayPerClickUniverse
  • SEMCompare
Consumer Tech
  • Windows Secrets
  • Overclockers
  • Mac Forums

Learn more about
advertising opportunities across the iNET Interactive Network.

LiquidWeb