Windows Secrets

Subscribers: Sign in

Enter your e-mail address to get a free subscription.
We guarantee your privacy
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Newsletter Archives
    • Current
    • LangaList Plus
    • Patch Watch
    • Wacky Web Week
    • Security Baseline
  • E-Books
  • Lounge
  • About us
    • Refunds
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Your Account
    • Upgrade
    • Preferences
    • Bonus Download
    • Unsubscribe
Home>Readers reveal the secrets of IE 7

Windows Secrets Newsletter • Issue 83 • 2006-09-28 • Circulation: over 400,000


Table of contents 
  • Top Story: Readers reveal the secrets of IE 7
  • Patch Watch: Protect yourself before and after patching
  • Hot Tips: Keep your PCs running smoothly
  • Perimeter Scan: Sun plans fixes for Java update problems
  • Woody's Windows: Phishing filters can hurt your privacy
  • Over the Horizon: IE flaws are back in the spotlight

 
Top Story

Readers reveal the secrets of IE 7

Brian livingston By Brian Livingston

Microsoft’s new browser, Internet Explorer version 7.0, will ship sometime soon with updated features and better security — so of course our contributing editor Woody Leonhard explained on Sept. 14 how to prevent version 7 from automatically downloading to your PC.

It’s not that there’s anything wrong with IE 7, mind you. Woody just thinks other people, not you, should be the first to get bitten by any point-oh bugs.

Disable IE 6 plug-ins before upgrading

Woody’s Sept. 14 story stimulated a great number of readers’ tips on the current beta version of IE 7. While I don’t recommend that you install IE 7 on a mission-critical machine, it’s certainly advisable to start testing the new browser on some separate, sacrificial machine. We’ll report on the good and the bad of IE 7 as soon as the final build is released and we can thoroughly scrutinize it.

In this issue, I’m bringing you the best of the tricks that have flowed in since our last newsletter. First up is reader Keith Swartz, who explains that IE 6 plug-ins and toolbars can conflict with IE 7 — but he has a fix:
  • “One thing that I think is worth mentioning, because I’ve been bit by this on several attempts to test the beta: if users do decide to accept the IE 7 upgrade (or even if they are testing the release candidates), they should DISABLE all plug-ins and toolbars in IE 6 BEFORE they upgrade. This will avoid crashes due to incompatibilities that may prevent the browser from even starting up.

    “I don’t know of any specific toolbars that are causing problems in the most recent drops (like J2SE, Acrobat, or Google), but I wouldn’t doubt there are still some problematic ones out there.

    “The best way to disable toolbars, in my opinion, is with a free tool called BHODemon 2.0. It has a very simple interface that shows you all your browser helper objects (BHOs — plug-ins or toolbars), and lets you simply uncheck a box to disable them the next time you start up IE.

    "The tool is available at MajorGeeks. The program was originally designed to aid in the reporting of and disabling of spyware BHOs. Unfortunately, the developer stopped updating the tool a year ago, so it’s no longer quite as suitable for that purpose. However, as a means of quickly disabling/reenabling BHOs, it’s as about as simple as you can get.”
Again, it’s not wise to install a beta of any software on a production machine. But if you’re testing IE 7 on a nonessential box, avoiding conflicts by disabling plug-ins and then reenabling them is a very good idea.

IE 7 still garbles many Web sites

There’s a reason that these things are called betas, as millions of testers are finding out at this very moment. Reader Stephen Wolper writes:
  • “I just installed IE 7 RC1 and had to uninstall it one week later. The biggest problem is the incompatibility with many Web sites and file-download programs. The fix offered by Microsoft to make your computer appear to be running IE 6 just does not work. In fact in my experience, it did absolutely nothing.

    “IE 7 has one improvement and that is a better printed page from a Web site. The tabbed browsing seems not much of an improvement over using IE in the quick-launch toolbar and launching a new IE window when necessaary.

    “In fact, the tabbed page system has one major annoyance and that is the increased possiblity of clicking the X in the upper-right corner and mistakenly closing all your IE windows. But MS has provided another annoyance to deal with this. Every time you click on the X in the top right corner, you get a warning message asking if you want to proceed or cancel. This reminds me of being back on AOL with the same annoying questions asking if you really want to exit AOL.

    “One good thing is that the add/remove entry in the Control Panel actually does work. I was able to uninstall IE 7 and IE 6 and all my Favorites, etc., were returned unharmed.

    “The most serious complaint I have is that Microsoft made the RC1 appear to me to be the likely final version and ready to go. It is far from ready to use and I would avoid it at all costs if it is not appreciably improved.”
Whether the glitches Wolper has encountered will still exist when the final version of IE 7 ships we won’t know until then. We’ll write more about these incompatibilities — and whether or not they were resolved — when the gold version of IE 7 is released.

Firefox still compares favorably with IE 7

The gotchas that still haunt the beta of IE 7 cause many readers to contrast Microsoft’s new browser with the fast-growing Mozilla Corp. browser, Firefox. Reader Jac Higgins writes:
  • “Because I was concerned about the security Swiss cheese that was IE 6, I installed IE 7 in each of its three beta flavors.

    "Perhaps my security fears were assuaged in the short-term. But these were replaced by 1) not having access to sites that were not ready for my beta browser; 2) loss of functionality in sites that required Microsoft Virtual Machine, and 3) loss of the full IE 6 FTP folder functions.

    "So I switched to Firefox and haven’t looked back.”
Perhaps because of the critical IE 6 security flaws that we’ve previously reported over the years, less than 50% of WindowsSecrets.com visitors currently use a version of IE, according to our server logs. The majority of visitors browse our Web site using Firefox, Opera, Netscape, or some other alternative.

We won’t know until the gold version of IE 7 comes out — and is automatically included on every new Windows PC that’s sold — whether IE’s minority status among advanced Windows users will remain true. Until then, our contributing editors are solid in their preference for Firefox. Over course, every Firefox user must make an occasional exception for a few sites (including several Microsoft services) that insist on working only with IE.

Upgrade to IE 7 just to cure IE 6

Whatever your opinion of Firefox may be, it’s hard to argue that IE 7 doesn’t offer any improved features over IE 6. Reader Pete Tirrell makes this point succinctly:
  • “I’ve been using the IE 7 betas on Win XP Pro since it was first introduced. Its latest incarnation, RC1, has come a long way from the first betas. Frankly, it’s pretty good.

    "Now, I also use Firefox (beta 2 currently) as my primary browser both at home and at work. I don’t think IE 7 holds a candle to Firefox 2, especially after installing a handful of useful extensions. There are so many things that FF can do that IE7 can’t — and tabbed browsing isn’t even on the list. Rearranging the toolbar, the Adblock extension, find-as-you-type, site-specific extensions, and skins are just a few that come to mind that I use on a regular basis.

    “What I think is key, though, is that while IE 7 isn’t (in my mind) as good as FF, it is leaps and bounds better than IE6. Therefore, I would encourage everyone to upgrade. I haven’t encountered any OS breaking problems in IE 7, and on all grounds it is better than its previous version.

    "For all those people who aren’t willing to give FF a try, forcing them to upgrade to a more secure, more modern Web browser should be mandatory.”
Because IE 6 is difficult if not impossible to fully remove from Windows XP, a strong argument can be made that upgrading to IE 7 will at least overwrite some of the nonsecure components that IE 6 introduced to the operating system. Will an upgrade to IE 7 fully eliminate the dangers of IE 6 code? That’s a subject that we’ll be very interested in covering as soon as the gold version of IE 7 is issued.

Is IE 7 easy to uninstall? That depends

IE 6 refuses to coexist on the same Windows machine with any previous version of Internet Explorer. By contrast, IE 7 is touted as being capable of working side-by-side with IE 6 (if you choose to keep both browsers rather than replacing IE 6 with IE 7). This harmonious situation is not necessatrily trouble-free, as reader Mitchell Weitz reports:
  • “Just read Woody’s warnings about IE 7. I already have had a bad experience with it, and contrary to Microsoft’s assurances, it did not uninstall easily, returning to IE 6.

    "I had to spend time on the phone with MS tech support to get it uninstalled, and then reinstall IE 6.

    "Incidentally, I was told that the reason I was having problems uninstalling IE 7 was that I had iTunes on my PC, and was instructed to remove iTunes to enable me to uninstall IE 7. (I wonder what the Justice Department would think of that!)”
A Microsoft browser refusing to work well with competing products? Who would ever imagine such a thing!

There’s more in today’s other columns

Elsewhere in this issue’s paid version, Woody tests IE 7′s new phishing filter and compares it with the antiphishing capabilities of the Firefox 2.0 beta. Scroll to Woody’s article

More readers’ tips, on a wide variety of Windows topics, are also included in this issue’s paid version, below. Free subscribers can get the paid version of this issue, plus the next 12 months of new paid content, simply by making a financial contribution of any amount — there’s no fixed fee. How to upgrade

To send us more information about IE 7, or to send us a tip on any other subject, visit the Windows Secrets contact page. You’ll receive a gift certificate for a book, CD, or DVD of your choice if you send us a comment that we print.

Brian Livingston is editor of the Windows Secrets Newsletter and the coauthor of Windows 2000 Secrets, Windows Me Secrets, and eight other books.
   

 
Patch Watch

Protect yourself before and after patching

Susan bradley By Susan Bradley

I’m flattered when folks say they don’t patch their systems until they read my column, but this month I’d rather you read Chris Mosby’s column first.

With all the unpatched issues that arise with IE, it’s not enough to be “fully patched” with Microsoft’s latest fix (MS06-055), you also need to install workarounds when you hear of them. Fixing recent Microsoft patches — for example, the two-week-old MS06-049 — is also essential, as I describe below.


MS06-055 (925486)
MS out-of-cycle patch stops IE VML attack

A zero-day Internet Explorer attack involving Vector Markup Language (VML) images was patched on Sept. 26 with Microsoft’s release of MS06-055 (925486). Since the Redmond company hadn’t initially promised to issue this patch before Oct. 10, a lot of us admins used workarounds to ensure that our machines were protected. Now that the patch is out, I’ve started gradually removing the mitigations and testing the patch for effectiveness.

If you can’t install the patch for some reason, I’ve made two tutorials for Windows Secrets readers, complete with numerous screen shots. These tutorials illustrate how admins can carry out the Group Policy workaround that Brian Livingston mentioned in his article in the Sept. 22 news update:

• To work around the VML issue, see my VML tutorial.

• To work around both the VML and DAXCL issues, see my GPO script tutorial.

Now that MS06-055 has been issued, you can undo the VML workaround. It’s important to note that 055, however, does not close the DAXCL hole, which involves the Microsoft DirectAnimation Path ActiveX Control. See the "Suggested Actions" section of MS security bulletin 925444 for workarounds to stop that threat.

To undo the VML trick, follow the instructions at the bottom of each of my tutorials. Also review the technique on Jesper Johansson’s Sept. 26 blog post.

Now that the official VML patch is out, I have options. Because the workaround is in place on my machines, I can patch whenever I wish. The patch just came out on Tuesday — and the side-effects of the workaround are slight, since few legitimate Web sites use VML images. So I think I’ll wait a bit to install the patch.

The 055 patch does not mandate rebooting. But I found on one test machine that when I launched Sharepoint (Microsoft’s shared-document Web site platform), closing IE threw off an error. Rebooting the workstation cleared up the issue.

For any of you who have not used the workaround to deregister the vulnerable DLL or change its ACL setting, by all means, do use the regsvr32 workaround (as described in Brian’s Sept. 22 news update) or install MS06-055 as soon as possible. The exploit code is being used in a number of Web sites and banner ads to infect workstations with malware.

Notice: I’ve learned that Microsoft also issued a “Windows Genuine Advantage update” out-of-cycle on Sept. 26. But I can find absolutely no information about the update or what it does. Would Microsoft please document these things in advance?

MS06-049 (921883)
Fix prevents MS06-049 from mangling files

For those of you who use and run Windows 2000, I want to ensure you’re aware of a much needed patch to a patch.

Installing MS06-049 (921883), which was released on Sept. 12, damages any files larger than 4KB that are written to NTFS compressed folders on Windows 2000 machines. You might think, “No problem, we don’t use compressed folders,” right?

Wrong. We all use compressed folders. Every time you install a security patch on a machine, the uninstall information — which you may desperately need someday — automatically goes into a compressed folder.

Microsoft released a hotfix on Sept. 26 to correct MS06-049′s data-corruption problem. It’s downloadable from KB article 925308. Without the fix, you risk not being able to undo a patch — and not being able to retrieve any other file you may write to a compressed folder.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Hot Tips

Keep your PCs running smoothly

Brian livingston By Brian Livingston.

Until we all have Star Trek computers — which operate perfectly on incomplete information when the captain simply barks, “Speculate!” — staying on top of the latest conflicts is part of our jobs.

In today’s column, I bring you the latest on Microsoft’s Live OneCare, concerns about wininet.dll, more glitches with the IE 7 beta, and yet another way to get around Windows Genuine Advantage.


MS OneCare won’t work with Norton AV

As Microsoft expands into online services, which can be billed on a continuing monthly or annual basis rather than a one-time payment, the corporation intrudes on turf that other companies thought were wide open.

Reader Scott Yorkovich writes about a recent change he’s found in Live OneCare, the Redmond software giant’s $50-per-year firewall, antivirus, and antispyware tool:
  • “I just had an amazing support call with MS Live OneCare technicians. You can verify the following with your MS contacts by asking about Case # SRX060816605375.

    “I installed Live OneCare earlier this year during the beta period. I didn’t do so for the antivirus or the spyware detection, but rather the slightly better firewall. Anyhow, everything seemed to be working fine and it was for months, until this evening. (In other words, they probably snuck something into an update recently.)

    “When I booted the computer, I got the message below:

    copy of image .bmp is in 060914 folder if needed

    This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

    Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Perimeter Scan

Sun plans fixes for Java update problems

Ryan russell By Ryan Russell

My Sept. 14 column on the broken Java update process has generated the biggest response I’ve received while writing for Windows Secrets.

I’m happy to report that I’ve gained some useful info from Sun about some of the Java issues I documented. Read on.


Some people need more than one Java

Let’s start off with the corrections. I received some feedback from Joe Ziber, who works for a large company that helps manage Java applications on almost 300,000 Navy computers. He takes me to task over two points. One, me telling everyone to delete various copies of Java on your machines. Two, me claiming that you only want one version of Java, something in the 1.5.0.8 or later range.

Should I have told you to blindly seek and destroy every copy of Java that isn’t in the proper Program Files directory? No, Joe is right about that. He points out that some apps need their own version of the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) installed in their own location. Did I know that? Yes. I didn’t mean to tell people to break any of their corporate apps by removing those versions of the JRE. I suspect people who manage these kinds of apps weren’t going to blindly delete them anyway, but you never know. In my attempts to be succinct, I failed to give proper warnings and caveats. I was trying to address the audience of desktop users who primarily use Java with their Web browser, and only want the one official installed version. Mea culpa.

Having said that, I do think you should be aware of the various extra JRE bits floating around your machine. So go ahead and do the search I mentioned last time, and make sure all the pieces are accounted for.

I’d also like to point out that I think that tight coupling of an app to a particular JRE like that is a failure of some of the original promise of Java. You should make sure such versions gets the proper patching and that your vendor supports you in that. You have to be aware of the tradeoff of security versus a properly functioning app.

Joe also informs me that Sun backports their fixes to JRE families 1.3 and 1.4. That I didn’t know, so I appreciate the education there. I’m also pleased to learn this because it should make supporting users with apps running those versions easier.

The backporting means that the fix I was concerned about is included in the latest 1.4 and 1.3 versions. I did note that Sun claims that the 1.3 family is soon to be end-of-lifed, so if you have apps that depend on the JRE version 1.3, you should be planning for some kind of upgrade.

Sun puts Java in system32

A couple of readers said they’ve discovered at least one installer that places copies of the Java components in the system32 directory. It’s the Sun Java installer itself. They had followed my exercise, uninstalled the various Java versions, installed 1.5.0.8, and found Java pieces in system32 (in addition to the expected Program Files directory). And the pieces in system32 were version 1.5.0.8.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Woody's Windows

Phishing filters can hurt your privacy

Woody leonhard By Woody Leonhard

Internet Explorer 7, due out later this year, sports a new phishing filter that effectively blocks bogus sites from tricking you into entering personal information.

One little problem. If you enable the phishing filter, Microsoft keeps records about you and every single Web site you visit.


It isn’t Microsoft’s fault

Lest you think that Microsoft wants to usurp the Web tracking capabilities of DoubleClick and other third-party cookie companies, consider the nature of the problem. Phishing sites appear and disappear in the blink of an electronic eye. The most convincing-looking sites might only be up for a day. Or half a day.

All a good phisher needs is a handful of gullible victims who believe they’re answering a real eBay message (what, you sold that non-existent laptop?), or a Wells Fargo message (gosh, they blocked that imaginary account again). The best phishing scams — the ones most likely to succeed — move quickly. A phishing site goes up, spam goes out, a couple thousand unsuspecting bank customers log on, and the site disappears. According to antiphishing.org’s June 2006 PDF report, the average phishing site stays up only 4.8 days. Back in P.T. Barnum’s day, there was a sucker born every minute. Nowadays, everything moves faster, eh?

An effective antiphishing tool needs to catch, identify, and block bad sites in a matter of hours or even minutes. Web browsers can (and do) identify some sites as suspicious by their inherent, uh, phishiness. But nailing a site conclusively requires human evaluation. The Internet’s a big place. Unless lots and lots of people are looking for bad sites — and unless the fruits of their efforts are made available rapidly to anyone visiting potentially problematic sites — we might as well cut bait.

Therein lies the rub. An antiphishing tool that guards against fresh attacks has to coordinate the observations and experiences of millions of people, feeding the results to potential victims very quickly.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Over the Horizon

IE flaws are back in the spotlight

Chris mosby By Chris Mosby

It didn’t take long before IE was back in my sights, and as usual the flaws that have come up are serious.

I’m rather tired of Microsoft acting like newfound flaws in IE are no big deal, no matter how critical the holes may be. I wish the company would quickly admit the problem, take responsibility, and just fix it.


Spread of VML attack is getting worse

As reported in Brian Livingston’s Sept. 22 news update, a zero-day IE exploit involving Vector Markup Language (VML) recently began affecting Windows users. Sunbelt Software illustrates in a Sept. 18 blog entry how Web sites are using this attack. This exploit allows hackers to infect users who merely view Web pages with images that take advantage of IE’s weakness.

Microsoft released security advisory 925568 on Sept. 19, providing workarounds for the problem until a patch could be released. At first, Microsoft only planned to release a solution on the next Patch Tuesday, Oct. 10. Recent events, however, changed these plans. The Redmond company released an out-of-cycle security patch, MS06-055, on Sept. 26, as described in Susan Bradley’s column, below.

Even though this remedy is now available, the spread of the VML exploit is getting worse. The exploit code has become widely available on the usual hacker Web sites and has even been modified to work more efficiently. For example, code has been added for browser and operating system detection. This allows specific versions of the exploit to run, based on the victim’s environment.

Legitimate sites have been compromised

Netcraft has reported that hackers compromised the servers of Web hosting firm HostGator, through another zero-day vulnerability in the very popular Web host administration software cPanel. That flaw allowed hackers to gain administrative access to an unknown number HostGator’s Web servers. These compromised machines then redirected visitors to sites using the VML exploit to infect visitor’s computers.

At this writing, HostGator said that it has reconfigured all of its servers to fix the problem. But as recently as Sept. 23, some of the company’s customers said that their sites were still redirecting visitors.

cPanel has released a patch to its software, but a lot of hosting companies will be open to the same kind of attack until they hear about and install the patch.

The risk is limited by the fact that this flaw can only be exploited by someone who has an account on a Web server with cPanel access. Still, this affair blows out of the water some security pundits warnings like, “Don’t visit untrusted Web sites.” Even legitimate Web sites can be employed to spread malware if a hacker makes enough effort.

Security researchers creating own patches

In response to the VML attack and other zero-day threats, a number of veteran security researchers banded together and formed the Zeroday Emergency Response Team (ZERT). One of their first actions was to produce a third-party patch for the VML vulnerability, as well as a test page that can be used to test to see if you are vulnerable to the VML exploit. (This patch was withdrawn and is no longer available to download in favor of Microsoft’s official patch.)

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

The Windows Secrets Newsletter is published weekly on the 1st through 4th Thursdays of each month, plus occasional news updates. We skip an issue on the 5th Thursday of any month, the week of Thanksgiving, and the last two weeks of August and December. Windows Secrets is a continuation of four merged publications: Brian's Buzz on Windows and Woody's Windows Watch in 2004, the LangaList in 2006, and the Support Alert Newsletter in 2008.

Publisher: WindowsSecrets.com, 1218 Third Ave., Suite 1515, Seattle, WA 98101 USA. Vendors, please send no unsolicited packages to this address (readers' letters are fine).

Editor in chief: Tracey Capen. Senior editors: Fred Langa, Woody Leonhard. Copyeditor: Roberta Scholz. Program director: Tony Johnston. Contributing editors: Yardena Arar, Susan Bradley, Scott Dunn, Michael Lasky, Scott Mace, Ryan Russell, Lincoln Spector, Robert Vamosi, Becky Waring. Product manager: Andy Boyd. Advertising director: Eric Gilley.

Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, Support Alert, LangaList, LangaList Plus, WinFind, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of WindowsSecrets.com. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: Anyone may subscribe to this newsletter by visiting our free signup page.

WE GUARANTEE YOUR PRIVACY:

1. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever.
2. We will never send you any unrequested e-mail, besides newsletter updates.
3. All unsubscribe requests are honored immediately, period.  Privacy policy

HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: To unsubscribe from the Windows Secrets Newsletter,
  • Visit our Unsubscribe page.
Copyright © 2012 by WindowsSecrets.com. All rights reserved.

Table of contents

Top-scoring articles in the past 12 months
  • Leaving long cookie trails throughout the Web 5.00
  • Windows-like security for Android devices 5.00
  • Win7′s no-reformat, nondestructive reinstall 4.53
  • The sorry tale of the (un)Secure Sockets Layer 4.42
  • RPV: Win7′s least-known data-protection system 4.33
  • Recovery: the last step in total data security 4.30
  • Time for a .NET update we can’t ignore 4.30
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 1 4.25
  • Revising printing habits saves money and trees 4.25
  • Upgrades end in erratic, partial hangs 4.25
  • Pros and cons of a ‘keyfile’ password 4.21
  • Beating back Duku and a plethora of other threats 4.20
  • Office 2007 gets its final service pack 4.19
  • Putting Registry-/system-cleanup apps to the test 4.19
  • One year and 99 security bulletins later 4.18
  • 1.8TB external drive goes down hard 4.17
  • Don’t pay for software you don’t need — Part 3 4.16
  • Internet Explorer gets another round of patches 4.15
  • Is your free AV tool a ‘resource pig?’ 4.15
  • Vacation’s over; it’s a big round of patches 4.15
  • Remote access leads to remote attacks 4.15
  • Keeping you up to date: say no to .NET — again 4.14
  • Take control of Google’s privacy policy settings 4.14
  • Office File Validation patch leads to problems 4.14
  • The advanced system-recover toolkit 4.13
  • New “419″ scam involves PayPal and Western Union 4.12
  • Readers’ best personal-privacy tips 4.11
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 2 4.11
  • Re-examining Dropbox and its alternatives 4.10
  • Easily edit Windows’ right-click context menus 4.09
Connect with us Follow us on Twitter Connect with us on Facebook View our RSS Feeds
  • Home|
  • Newsletter|
  • About Windows Secrets|
  • Advertise with us|
  • Unsubscribe|
  • Sitemap|
  • Affiliates|
Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, WinFind, Windows Gizmos, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of iNET Interactive. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.
iNET Interactive Copyright © 2011 iNET Interactive.
All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy
Internet Services
  • Web Hosting Talk
  • HostingCon
  • Hosting Catalog
  • Host Voice
Web Development
  • Hot Scripts
  • DB Forums
Digital Marketing
  • ABestWeb
  • Search Marketing Standard
  • PayPerClickUniverse
  • SEMCompare
Consumer Tech
  • Windows Secrets
  • Overclockers
  • Mac Forums

Learn more about
advertising opportunities across the iNET Interactive Network.

LiquidWeb