Windows Secrets

Subscribers: Sign in

Enter your e-mail address to get a free subscription.
We guarantee your privacy
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Newsletter Archives
    • Current
    • LangaList Plus
    • Patch Watch
    • Wacky Web Week
    • Security Baseline
  • E-Books
  • Lounge
  • About us
    • Refunds
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Your Account
    • Upgrade
    • Preferences
    • Bonus Download
    • Unsubscribe
Home>These speedup utilities aren't worth your money

Windows Secrets Newsletter • Issue 174 • 2008-11-06 • Circulation: over 400,000


Table of contents 
  • Introduction: Free ‘job insecurity’ download still available
  • Top Story: These speedup utilities aren’t worth your money
  • Known Issues: Sync your Outlook and mobile-phone contacts
  • Wacky Web Week: Nothing’s lost in this 80s-video translation!
  • LangaList Plus: XP’s ‘other’ Explorer can be a real CPU hog
  • Best Software: Windows’ Registry explained in plain English
  • Woody's Windows: Like Flash, Silverlight poses a privacy risk
  • Known Issues: Some sites break without Flash cookies enabled

 
Introduction

Free ‘job insecurity’ download still available

Brian livingston By Brian Livingston

This month’s free bonus remains ready for you to download, which is a good thing in case you couldn’t get to it last week.

For a few hours prior to 10 a.m. Pacific Time on Oct. 30, our subscribers who tried to download the file received the previous month’s file instead, due to a single erroneous character that I mistyped in a line of code — mea culpa!

No job? no prob!

That glitch was quickly found and fixed, so if you couldn’t retrieve the correct file last week, simply visit your preferences page once again, click the Save button, and then use the download link that appears.

Our free bonus — No Job? No Prob! — is a tongue-in-cheek guide for those who suddenly find themselves unemployed. For a limited time, all Windows Secrets subscribers are eligible to download a PDF e-book excerpt with four full chapters free of charge. You may not need it today, but this light-hearted how-to will be nice to have if the economy gives you a bit of a surprise.

All subscribers: Check your prefs page and download your bonuses
Info on the printed book: United States / Canada / Elsewhere

Every few weeks, we license some new content for our subscribers to download at no cost. I hope you enjoy our latest treat. Thanks for your support!

Brian Livingston is editorial director of WindowsSecrets.com and co-author of Windows Vista Secrets and 10 other books.

 
Top Story

These speedup utilities aren’t worth your money

Scott dunn By Scott Dunn

Can you really get the extra oomph you want for your system just by shelling out a few bucks for a speedup program?

Many effective utilities do exist, but in my testing I found three that I consider to be just a waste of your hard-earned cash.

Dozens of Windows utilities promise to optimize your system’s memory, improve your Internet connection speed, and rev up disk-access times to provide an overall performance boost. Some of these benefits can be demonstrated. For example, in a Sept. 11, 2008, Best Software column (paid content), Windows Secrets contributing editor Scott Spanbauer found three Windows cleanup utilities worth recommending: Business Logic’s WinCleaner OneClick Professional Clean, Piriform’s CCleaner, and PC Pitstop’s PC Optimize.

Other programs promise fantastical performance. The makers of System Speedup Wizard and PC Speeduper, two nearly identical programs I tested, claim to include “new 2007 hard-disk optimization technology that allows your computer to read data up to 300% faster from your hard drive.”

The Web pages for these products go on to say that each one “optimizes your RAM and configures other settings to speed up your Internet connection and overall computer performance.”

To put these and similar claims to the test, I timed how long it took an XP system to perform the following everyday computing tasks:
  • Boot to the Windows login screen
  • Log into Windows
  • Open a large QuickTime movie file
  • Open a large RTF file in WordPad
  • Exit Windows
I then installed each of four speedup utilities for this review, ran each program’s optimize routine (if it had one), and timed the tasks again. I restored my test machine to its original configuration between each product test. I ran the tests multiple times for each product and averaged the results.

As shown in Table 1, the tests reveal a few minor speedups, but nothing that the average person is likely to notice. In most cases, the differences were under one second.

Table 1. These utilities provided little or no speed up, and sometimes slowed things down. (Time in seconds, smaller numbers are better.)

Product
Boot to login
Log in to Windows
Open QT movie
Open .rtf in WordPad
Exit Windows
Windows XP (no utility)
33.5
9.6
6.0
2.3
9.2
PC Speeduper
33.5
9.0
5.3
2.1
9.2
System Speedup Wizard
32.8
9.0
5.0
2.1
9.0
SpeedUpMyPC 2009
35.8
9.2
5.5
2.3
10.1
Windows Performance
34.5
9.1
5.0
2.0
9.8


Given the small and irregular improvements, it’s just as likely that some of the variations were due to random Windows behavior as to any optimizing the products themselves did.

Of course, it’s possible that speedup utilities might have a greater effect on older, badly maintained systems than they had on my one-year-old test system. And to be fair, not every program I tested claims to improve the specific tasks I tested for. Rather, these operations were chosen as ones most likely to make a Windows user wait.

Moreover, most of the products I reviewed provide only a general overview of what they do. None of them offers a help file, user manual, or other documentation describing the nitty-gritty of how these programs operate.

SpeedUpMyPC 2009 and Windows Performance are a little better in this regard, providing short descriptions of each setting. However, you have to know where to click. The information isn’t available in a searchable Help file. Clicking the Help icon in Windows Performance takes you to a Web page that is more marketing than documentation.

In addition, the programs’ customization settings are minimal. You can’t tweak the optimization routines in the slightest, although SpeedUpMyPC and Windows Performance let you choose whether to run individual types of scans and cleanings. It’s like having a car that lets you turn some of your dashboard accessories on or off but prevents you from adjusting the temperature or the station on the radio. And just forget about peeking under the hood.

At least SpeedUpMyPC lets you uncheck boxes for individual temp files before the program deletes them. However, you can’t change the folders and files it considers “junk.”

Given these results, I can’t recommend any of these programs and, unlike other reviews I’ve published, I’m not assigning numerical scores.

Two names, two prices, but the same product

Two of the products I tested appear to be entirely identical except for their names. Even their separate Web sites are exactly alike except for the product name and illustration.

The only apparent difference is that System Speedup Wizard requires installation, while PC Speeduper merely requires that you unzip the download files and launch the executable. System Speedup Wizard, at a price of U.S. $20, is also more than twice the cost of PC Speeduper ($9).

Neither program requires much participation on your part. By default, the Enable Speedup box is checked and Speedup Settings are set to High. The only other option is Realtime, but I couldn’t find any explanation of the difference between these settings.

The “Run [product name] at Windows Startup” setting is not on by default, but the products need to be running to affect your system. After all, the vendor sites claim the technology “works in the background to optimize applications constantly.” Unfortunately, the products themselves don’t tell you that.

Not surprisingly, the two programs turned in nearly identical results on my tests, with less than a one-second difference on the boot test and less than a half-second or no difference on the others.

Both programs offer a 14-day trial period, though I don’t think either is particularly worth trying.

System optimizer has ease of use but little else

SpeedUpMyPC 2009 — like the other programs covered here — presents a tabbed window to organize its features into Overview, System Scan, Cleanup, Optimization, and Settings. The two main actions you can take in most tabs are scan and optimize. The Cleanup and Optimization tabs have further subdivisions and even sub-subdivisions. This makes the interface cleaner and more accessible, but it also makes it more difficult to find certain features.

Although I could find no Help file per se, some of the program’s tabs (such as the Windows subsection of the Optimization tab) provide capsule descriptions of settings after you check the Show tweak descriptions box.

These so-called tweaks are primarily changes to Registry settings. I didn’t examine them in detail, but at least one (“Disable paging executive”) has been debunked as not very useful by the site XP Myths (scroll to the middle of the long page to find the pertinent information).

The Optimization tab also includes features that are parallel to and, for all practical purposes, duplicate features found elsewhere in Windows — such as CPU Monitor and CPU Booster (see Windows’ Task Manager) or Uninstall Manager (see Add or Remove Programs in Windows’ Control Panel).

For example, to get the equivalent of the CPU Booster — which lets you change the priority the processor gives to an application — right-click the taskbar, choose Task Manager, click the Processes tab, right-click the desired executable, and choose an option from the Set Priority submenu.

The Startup Manager feature is not found in Windows, but you can get the same features in Mike Lin’s free Startup Control Panel utility rather than pay $30 for this tool.

If you want a program that requires only one or two clicks to apply a variety of popular speedup tweaks, SpeedUpMyPC may be worth your money. But if you’re on a budget, you’ll save some green by sticking to the advice you find in Windows Secrets.

Multifunction speed tweaker offers few answers

Windows Performance claims to optimize, repair, and clean your system. The program’s five main divisions are Windows Registry, CPU/Memory/HDD, Network/Internet, Configuration/Appearance, and Startup. Within each of these are checkboxes denoting tasks that streamline your system.

UPDATE 2009-08-25: Windows Performance is no longer available.

Unfortunately, the array of options doesn’t clearly explain what’s going on. You can get information on individual settings under the Details column, but the descriptions never amount to more than a few sentences and often assume expertise users may not have.

Also, the upper-right corner lets you turn “Protection” on or off but doesn’t tell you what that means. The page that formerly listed the product’s features suggested this is designed to “eliminate dangerous spyware, block hidden malware from altering your system settings, and repair security vulnerabilities.” (Note that the page is no longer available.) Gee — all that, and no settings or information on how this works.

For all I know, Windows Performance may do some really valuable things for your PC. But — as with the other products I tested — the program has little impact on daily PC tasks.

Scott Dunn is associate editor of the Windows Secrets Newsletter. He has been a contributing editor of PC World since 1992 and currently writes for the Here’s How section of that magazine.

 
Known Issues

Sync your Outlook and mobile-phone contacts

Dennis o'reilly By Dennis O’Reilly

Scott Dunn’s Oct. 23 lead story, which described workarounds to help you sync Outlook contacts and calendars with an iPhone, neglected to provide detailed steps for users of BlackBerrys, Windows Mobile, and other devices.

Fortunately, the procedure to merge data with these other phones’ address books requires only the sync software that shipped with your mobile device.

For better or worse, Windows dominates desktop computing. Even though the Windows community is currently split between XP and Vista, there’s enough commonality between the versions — some would argue too much commonality, others not enough — that we can make general statements that apply to both.

Not so with our mobile phones.

There’s no dominant platform for mobile devices. BlackBerrys, Windows Mobile phones, and iPhones all have healthy market shares. That’s good for consumers, but it makes it a bit difficult to describe what works on all those devices.

Fortunately, synching your Windows contact list with a BlackBerry or Windows Mobile is a snap. Simply use the software that ships with the respective devices, such as BlackBerry Desktop and ActiveSync (for XP) or Windows Mobile Device Center (for Vista).

A post on the BlackBerry Insight Forums describes the contact-synching process for Research In Motion’s phones. Also, troubleshooting tips for BlackBerry sync problems and help with ActiveSync glitches are available at the BlackBerry site, while tips for the Windows Mobile Device Center are posted at Microsoft.com.

Former Windows Secrets program director Brent Scheffler writes about a technique he used to sync Outlook 2007 contacts with his new T-Mobile G1 phone, which might help users of other devices, too:
  • “Apropos of importing contacts into an iPhone, I recently picked up the new T-Mobile G1 phone and had some difficulties exporting the contacts from my Outlook 2007 into my Gmail contacts.

    “For some reason, not all contacts and data fields made the transition into Gmail. After several attempts, I then remembered that Outlook Express and Windows Mail have much better import/export features than their full-priced Office cousin, Outlook 2007.

    “To import your contacts from Outlook 2007 (should work for previous versions of Outlook as well), use the following steps:

    • Step 1: Open Outlook 2007 and export your contacts using Outlook’s Import/Export feature. Click File, Import and Export, select Export to a file, choose Comma Separated Values (Windows), click Contacts, and choose a path and file name to save the file to. Exit Outlook 2007.

    • Step 2: Now open Outlook Express (XP) or Windows Mail (Vista) and use the programs’ Import feature to add the CSV file you just created. In Outlook Express, click File, Import, Other Address Book; and then select Text file (Comma Separated Values). Choose Import and select the CSV file you created in step 1.

    “In Windows Mail, select File, Import, Windows Contacts; click CSV (Comma Separated Values) and choose the CSV file you created in step 1.

    • Step 3: Once the contacts have been imported into Outlook Express or Windows Mail, you export the contacts back to a CSV file. Give the new export file a different name so you do not overwrite the original Outlook 2007 contacts CSV file.

    “In Outlook Express, select File, Export, Address Book; choose Text file (Comma Separated Values), click Export, and enter a path and file name to save the contacts to.

    “For Windows Mail, select File, Export, Windows Contacts. Click CSV (Comma Separated Values), choose Export, and select a path and file name to save the contacts to.

    • Step 4: To import the contacts into Gmail’s contact list, log into your Gmail account and click the Contacts link in the left column. After the page has loaded, click the Import link in the upper right, select the CSV file that you created in Outlook Express or Windows Mail, and click the Import button.

    “Presto! All of your contacts are properly imported and should be synched with your G1 phone in a few minutes.”
You’ll find more information on troubleshooting Gmail glitches on Google’s Help Center page.

If you run Windows on a Mac, you need to patch

In last week’s Top Story, Susan Bradley answered a reader’s question about whether someone running Microsoft applications on a Macintosh would be affected by the out-of-cycle patch Microsoft released the previous week. Susan answered that this wasn’t necessary.

However, the reader’s question referred to Microsoft Office and other applications from the company, not Windows. Several readers pointed out that Macs running Windows need the patch as well. The story should have stated that Macs running Microsoft programs other than Windows needn’t apply the out-of-cycle patch.

The Known Issues column brings you readers’ comments on our recent articles. Dennis O’Reilly is technical editor of WindowsSecrets.com.

 
Wacky Web Week

Nothing’s lost in this 80s-video translation!

cartoon face By Katy Abby

Music videos have been a significant component of popular culture since the 1980s, providing musicians with another artistic avenue to express their creativity. Production values run the gamut — from bare-bones to extravagant to just-plain bizarre (the same could be said about the ’80s as a whole!).

Take a fresh look at this popular 1985 release from A-Ha. Your trip down memory lane won’t be quite as you recall it, but only because the literal reworking provides a frame-by-frame — or sketch-by-sketch — account of the action! Play the video


 
LangaList Plus

XP’s ‘other’ Explorer can be a real CPU hog

Fred langa By Fred Langa

A bad naming decision by Microsoft means you have two different “Explorers” on your XP system.

Here’s what to do when the lesser-known one starts causing trouble.


Explorer executable file drives an XP user nuts

Don Clucas sounded pretty desperate when he wrote:
  • “If I leave my computer on for a day, explorer.exe takes over and all I can do is shut down. It is not iexplore.exe, which I can find, but the other one that I cannot find in the computer.

    “[The file] takes over and nothing else works. It’s driving me nuts. I have Googled until exhausted and still no solution. Help!!!”

I understand your frustration, Don. In part, it’s because there are two “Explorers” on your Windows XP machine — and everyone else’s, too. You see, Microsoft’s original plan, way back in the mid-90s, was to create a single “Explorer” that would let you navigate everywhere: your hard drive, the Web, the local dry cleaners, wherever. (Well, maybe not the dry cleaners.)

That plan was partially realized but then derailed by the antitrust actions that prevented Microsoft from encroaching further onto other Web browsers’ turf. So, we now have two separate Explorers on our systems: “Internet Explorer” (iexplore.exe), the well-known Web browser that gets all the attention, and the less-well-known “Windows Explorer” (explorer.exe).

Even though you may be less familiar with the name “Windows Explorer,” you use the program all the time. Explorer.exe is the component of Windows that provides the desktop, file browser, taskbar, and most of the windows through which we interact with our PCs.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Best Software

Windows’ Registry explained in plain English

Ian richards By Ian “Gizmo” Richards

Most PC users have heard of the Windows Registry yet have no idea what it does.

This article presents in simple terms the purpose of the Registry, how it functions, and how to make basic changes that will optimize your PC’s performance.


So, just what is the Registry, anyway?

The easiest way to envision the Registry is to see it as a centralized database containing details about your PC’s hardware, software, and users. In reality, the Registry is somewhat more than this, but if you think of it this way, you’re on the right track.

The Registry is needed because hardware, software, and user setups vary. PCs can differ in the number and size of hard drives, the amount of memory, the software installed, and hundreds of other ways.

To run efficiently, Windows and other programs need to know the particular setup of the computer they’re running on. This information can be found in the Registry, which serves as the centralized repository of information about your PC and is accessible to all the software running on the machine.

Last year, I encountered a domestic equivalent of the Registry when I rented an apartment at a ski resort. The apartment’s modern kitchen contained all the usual things you expect to find there: an oven, a refrigerator, pots and pans, cutlery, etc.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Woody's Windows

Like Flash, Silverlight poses a privacy risk

Woody leonhard By Woody Leonhard

Many readers were outraged by my last column’s revelation that Adobe’s Flash Player maintains hidden cookies on your computer that are outside the reach of your browser’s controls.

It’s not just Flash: Microsoft’s Silverlight — the Softies’ intended Flash killer — covers much of the same ground and poses similar security problems.


What Flash and Silverlight have in common

As I explained in my Oct. 23 column, Adobe’s Flash Player maintains its own version of cookies — text files stored on your computer that can be set and read by an individual Web site. Flash’s Local Shared Objects (LSOs) look like cookies and act more or less like rogue cookies.

By default, LSOs can store up to 100KB of data. Regular cookies are limited to 4KB. Your browser can’t touch LSOs, even when you clear or restrict your cookies, because LSOs operate completely independently. Adobe offers an online program that gives you some access to the LSOs, but the tool is clunky, archaic, and — until I wrote about it last week — virtually unknown.

Microsoft’s new Silverlight platform takes on Flash in many ways. Silverlight’s Isolated Storage feature walks like a duck and quacks like a … er, bears more than a passing resemblance to Flash’s LSOs.

Using Isolated Storage, a Web site can store up to 100KB of text on your computer (more, if you give permission). The text is maintained completely independently of your browser. As with LSOs, your browser can’t touch Independent Storage, even when you clear or restrict your cookies. Microsoft offers an obscure program that gives you some access to Isolated Storage, but the utility offers you few options.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Known Issues

Some sites break without Flash cookies enabled

By Dennis O’Reilly

There was a remarkably large response to Woody Leonhard’s Oct. 23 column on deactivating the Local Shared Objects (LSO) in Adobe’s Flash Player.

Few people were aware of Flash’s version of third-party tracking cookies, which advertisers use to keep tabs on your surfing habits and deliver ads based on your activities on previously visited sites.

Unfortunately, we also heard from readers who found that some of their favorite sites broke when they blocked the sites’ access to third-party LSOs. Heaven only knows why the sites rely on third-party LSOs when regular LSOs should work fine.

For reader Stephen Addy, the Flash-cookie casualty was MTV’s new music-video service:

  • “In reference to Woody’s great report about Adobe cookies, just to let you know that I followed the advice and then found a few Web sites, such as the recently released www.mtvmusic.com, were not working.

    “I managed to track this down to stopping third-party cookies under Flash. If I turned on the ability to allow third-party cookies, the site worked correctly. This might be something to update the readers with to let them know where to look if issues occur.”

Another site that relies on Flash’s third-party LSos is a popular Internet radio service, as reported by reader David Kramer:

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

The Windows Secrets Newsletter is published weekly on the 1st through 4th Thursdays of each month, plus occasional news updates. We skip an issue on the 5th Thursday of any month, the week of Thanksgiving, and the last two weeks of August and December. Windows Secrets is a continuation of four merged publications: Brian's Buzz on Windows and Woody's Windows Watch in 2004, the LangaList in 2006, and the Support Alert Newsletter in 2008.

Publisher: WindowsSecrets.com, 1218 Third Ave., Suite 1515, Seattle, WA 98101 USA. Vendors, please send no unsolicited packages to this address (readers' letters are fine).

Editor in chief: Tracey Capen. Senior editors: Fred Langa, Woody Leonhard. Copyeditor: Roberta Scholz. Program director: Tony Johnston. Contributing editors: Yardena Arar, Susan Bradley, Scott Dunn, Michael Lasky, Scott Mace, Ryan Russell, Lincoln Spector, Robert Vamosi, Becky Waring. Product manager: Andy Boyd. Advertising director: Eric Gilley.

Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, Support Alert, LangaList, LangaList Plus, WinFind, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of WindowsSecrets.com. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: Anyone may subscribe to this newsletter by visiting our free signup page.

WE GUARANTEE YOUR PRIVACY:

1. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever.
2. We will never send you any unrequested e-mail, besides newsletter updates.
3. All unsubscribe requests are honored immediately, period.  Privacy policy

HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: To unsubscribe from the Windows Secrets Newsletter,
  • Visit our Unsubscribe page.
Copyright © 2012 by WindowsSecrets.com. All rights reserved.

Table of contents

Top-scoring articles in the past 12 months
  • Leaving long cookie trails throughout the Web 5.00
  • Windows-like security for Android devices 5.00
  • Win7′s no-reformat, nondestructive reinstall 4.53
  • The sorry tale of the (un)Secure Sockets Layer 4.42
  • RPV: Win7′s least-known data-protection system 4.33
  • Recovery: the last step in total data security 4.30
  • Time for a .NET update we can’t ignore 4.30
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 1 4.25
  • Revising printing habits saves money and trees 4.25
  • Upgrades end in erratic, partial hangs 4.25
  • Pros and cons of a ‘keyfile’ password 4.21
  • Beating back Duku and a plethora of other threats 4.20
  • Office 2007 gets its final service pack 4.19
  • Putting Registry-/system-cleanup apps to the test 4.19
  • One year and 99 security bulletins later 4.18
  • 1.8TB external drive goes down hard 4.17
  • Don’t pay for software you don’t need — Part 3 4.16
  • Internet Explorer gets another round of patches 4.15
  • Is your free AV tool a ‘resource pig?’ 4.15
  • Vacation’s over; it’s a big round of patches 4.15
  • Remote access leads to remote attacks 4.15
  • Keeping you up to date: say no to .NET — again 4.14
  • Take control of Google’s privacy policy settings 4.14
  • Office File Validation patch leads to problems 4.14
  • The advanced system-recover toolkit 4.13
  • New “419″ scam involves PayPal and Western Union 4.12
  • Readers’ best personal-privacy tips 4.11
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 2 4.11
  • Re-examining Dropbox and its alternatives 4.10
  • Easily edit Windows’ right-click context menus 4.09
Connect with us Follow us on Twitter Connect with us on Facebook View our RSS Feeds
  • Home|
  • Newsletter|
  • About Windows Secrets|
  • Advertise with us|
  • Unsubscribe|
  • Sitemap|
  • Affiliates|
Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, WinFind, Windows Gizmos, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of iNET Interactive. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.
iNET Interactive Copyright © 2011 iNET Interactive.
All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy
Internet Services
  • Web Hosting Talk
  • HostingCon
  • Hosting Catalog
  • Host Voice
Web Development
  • Hot Scripts
  • DB Forums
Digital Marketing
  • ABestWeb
  • Search Marketing Standard
  • PayPerClickUniverse
  • SEMCompare
Consumer Tech
  • Windows Secrets
  • Overclockers
  • Mac Forums

Learn more about
advertising opportunities across the iNET Interactive Network.

LiquidWeb