Windows Secrets

Subscribers: Sign in

Enter your e-mail address to get a free subscription.
We guarantee your privacy
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Newsletter Archives
    • Current
    • LangaList Plus
    • Patch Watch
    • Wacky Web Week
    • Security Baseline
  • E-Books
  • Lounge
  • About us
    • Refunds
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Your Account
    • Upgrade
    • Preferences
    • Bonus Download
    • Unsubscribe
Home>When Automatic Updates can be harmful

Windows Secrets Newsletter • Issue 75 • 2006-05-11 • Circulation: over 400,000


Table of contents 
  • Top Story: When Automatic Updates can be harmful
  • Over the Horizon: Patch one and find two more
  • Patch Watch: Flash causes headaches for home patchers
  • Perimeter Scan: Some excellent reasons to update Firefox

 
Top Story

When Automatic Updates can be harmful

Woody leonhard By Woody Leonhard

For years I’ve been advising Windows consumers to disable Automatic Updates: Keep Microsoft’s mitts off your machine until you’re darn sure the proffered patches do more good than harm.

I’ve taken a lot of flak for that heretical stance, vilified for intimating that Microsoft’s patching process leaves consumers in the lurch. Bah. Recent events have proved my point conclusively: Windows auto-update is for chumps.

The auto-update process

Take a second right now to check your auto update settings. Click Start, Control Panel, Security Center. Don’t click the Automatic Updates bar at the top — Microsoft has the dialog box rigged to turn on auto-updating if you click around indiscriminately. Instead, click the "Automatic Updates" line at the bottom of the Security Center. Windows shows you an official-looking dialog box — "Help Protect Your PC," it says — with a cheerful good green shield at the top and a naughty bad red shield at the bottom.

If you’re setting up Windows for your Great-Aunt Millicent who frets that playing Solitaire will lock up her PC, go ahead and click "Automatic (recommended)" and resign yourself to your technical co-dependent relationship.

But if you’re even moderately conversant with Windows — certainly if you’re reading this newsletter — check one of the other buttons. I recommend "Notify me but don’t automatically download or install them." That way I have two chances to catch myself before installing everything Microsoft pushes out the Patch Tuesday door.

With auto updates disabled, the next time Microsoft has a "critical" patch that it wants to push onto your machine, a balloon will pop up out of a yellow shield in the system tray, next to the clock at the bottom of the screen. The balloon will ask your permission to download and/or install whatever software Microsoft has on offer. Your job is to refrain from giving that permission until millions of clueless Windows users have an, uh, opportunity to beta test Microsoft’s latest missives.

What happened last month, Part I

Permit me to summarize the Windows Automatic Updates Out-of-Box Experience of the past month, from a consumer’s perspective.

On April 11, 2006 — a Patch Tuesday that will live in infamy — Microsoft released four collections of patches. Two were relatively innocuous, at least for Windows consumers.

One of the patch collections, MS06-016 (917288), “patched” Outlook Express on some PCs so well that OE couldn’t open its address book.

Many people who had Windows set for automatic updating got up one morning, sat down at their PCs, downloaded their mail, and suddenly discovered that they couldn’t reply to messages. Every time they tried to get into their address books, Windows just sat there. Without their knowledge, Microsoft had simply reached into their PCs and broken Outlook Express. No warning. No thank you very much. No nuthin’.

The other patch collection, MS06-015 (911562) contained a new, inadequately tested Mr. Hyde version of a program called verclsid.exe that wreaked all sorts of havoc on some machines:

• Windows Explorer would freeze when attempting to get into My Documents or My Pictures.

• Word and Excel would freeze when trying to open or save a doc in My Documents.

• Internet Explorer would freeze unless you typed http:// in front of a Web address.

And so on. Microsoft’s lengthy error list is at KB 918165. That article currently sits at version 4.2, having undergone three major revisions and then some — a sure sign that the error list itself had numerous errors.

Although the MS06-015 patch was officially released on Tuesday, Apr. 11, it wasn’t pushed out the Automatic Update chute in the U.S. until that Saturday or Sunday. Lots of people trying to finish their income taxes over that last-minute April 15 "tax weekend" ran scrambling for alternatives when they discovered they couldn’t use Excel or Internet Explorer.

What happened last month, Part II

Last month’s auto-update debacle doesn’t stop there. For the first time in history, Microsoft released a passel of three more patches, out of cycle, two weeks after Patch Tuesday. Except, er, uh, two of the three "critical patches" weren’t really critical patches at all.

The first patch patched the MS06-015 patch by jiggering a couple of Registry settings. Microsoft gave fair warning — the fix was widely anticipated and appears to stop the insanity generated by the original patch. Victimized Windows consumers who left automatic updates on suddenly discovered, almost two weeks after the original botch job, that Word and Excel and Windows Explorer and Internet Explorer started working properly again. Magic.

The second mid-month out-of-sequence patch still leaves me scratching my head. Microsoft pushed an obscure five-month-old patch through the automatic update system, with no forewarning, no explanation, and no reason that I can discern. That patch (900845) replaces a program called aec.sys, which is an acoustic error-canceling driver, of all things. My guess — and it’s only a guess — is that Microsoft somehow accidentally released this patch into the Automatic Updates food chain. Kinda makes me shudder.

The third mid-month "critical update" patch — which also got shoved onto all PCs with automatic update activated — isn’t a patch at all, critical or otherwise. It’s the new version of Windows Genuine Nagware, er, Windows Genuine Advantage.

With this little gem installed (905474), if Microsoft’s computers can’t verify your copy of Windows, your desktop gets plastered with all sorts of irritating, incessant nags. As far as I can tell there was little, if any, advance warning that this "critical update" (yeah, sure) was going to get rammed down U.S. users’ throats in an out-of-cycle mid-month automatic update. I could find nothing but this press release, dated the same day Windows Genuine Nagware spewed down the Automatic Updates chute.

From where I stand, Microsoft has shown that it’ll use Automatic Updates to shove any software change onto any system that it darn well pleases, any time it likes. This isn’t a conspiracy theory. Microsoft isn’t a monolith. There’s no Big Brother or master plan behind it all, no Mini-Me lurking in the shadows. Instead, what we’re seeing is a bunch of stupid decisions, propagated to a hundred million PCs, by people who have demonstrated, repeatedly, that they can’t be trusted with the task.

There is a better way

Keeping your PC working well is a tough job. You know that.

Big companies employ network admins who get to wrangle with Microsoft’s offal before updating company computers. It’s a tough, thankless job.

But what of us lowly individual Windows consumers? We’re left holding the bag. Cannon fodder. We’re the folks who get hit with the bugs — the unwitting beta testers for Microsoft’s frequently ill-prepared patches and funny little nagware programs, too.

I say it’s time for Windows consumers to take their patching destinies into their own hands. Turn off Automatic Updates. Sit and watch and listen, and judge for yourself when it’s time to patch or not to patch. Keep your eyes on this newsletter, on my Microsoft Patch Reliability Ratings page, watch the newsgroups, and any other places you can find that have an independent point of view. Listen to people you know and trust before letting Microsoft monkey around with your PC.

My critics will have you believe that failing to patch Windows at the very moment Microsoft pushes a patch down the automatic update chute will leave you poor, helpless, befuddled and (worst of all!) vulnerable. Poppycock. Microsoft itself waits to see if its newly released patches cause problems before sending them through auto-update. The major problem: they don’t wait long enough!

Very, very few people get hit with exploits based on newly announced security holes shortly after Microsoft’s patches appear. Yes, you need to patch your system. No, you don’t need to do it right away, particularly if you keep the rest of your security arsenal updated and working properly.

Take your time. The machine you save may be your own.

Woody Leonhard writes books about Windows and Office. His most recent works are Windows XP All-In-One Desk Reference For Dummies, Windows XP Timesaving Techniques For Dummies, Windows XP Hacks & Mods For Dummies, Office 2003 Timesaving Techniques For Dummies, and Special Edition Using Office 2003 (with Ed Bott).

 
Over the Horizon

Patch one and find two more

Chris mosby That’s the way it seems to go these days: Microsoft — or any software vendor for that matter — patches a piece of software, and someone goes and finds some other flaw that can be exploited. I guess that’s become the price we all have to pay for working with technology; we all have to try to be one step ahead of the hackers out there.

While Microsoft is by no means perfect in the area of security, it is at least trying to do better. This has become clear to me after attending the Microsoft Management Summit a few weeks ago — at the same time as I’ve just start scratching the surface in my role as a newly awarded MVP. Don’t think you can get rid of me anytime soon, though; there are still plenty of unpatched vulnerabilities out there to tell you about.

IE ‘object’ tags cause memory corruption

Shortly after Microsoft released a cumulative patch for Internet Explorer that fixed ten documented vulnerabilities, Michal Zalewski discovered a flaw in the way IE handles certain sequences of nested “object” HTML tags. This vulnerability can be used to corrupt memory if a user can be persuaded to visit an infected Web site.

Originally, this flaw was not known to be able to launch infected code; but a Secunia researcher discovered a variant of the flaw that did allow programs to be launched without user interaction soon after that. This was done on a fully patched system with IE 6.0 SP2 and Windows XP SP2.

Secunia has since turned their findings over to Microsoft, who is now working on a patch to fix this problem.

What to do: If using another browser like Firefox is not an option for you, you can think about following Secunia’s suggestion and staying away from "untrusted" websites.  I’d prefer that you secure IE using Brian’s recommended settings instead, you might have a lot better luck until Microsoft releases a patch.

More information: CVE-2006-1992, CVE-2006-2218, Security Tracker, FrSIRT, SecurityFocus, National Vulnerability Database

IE redirection flaw can disclose information

Another vulnerability in IE was disclosed late last month, which is enough to make any phisher jump for joy. This vulnerability is caused due to an error in redirections for URLs with the mhtml: URL handler.

Successful exploitation of this flaw can allow access of documents from another Web site. For example, if you were logged on to your bank account online, any Web site after this flaw was exploited would be able to get information from your bank’s Web site.

To see just what this means and the implications for browser security, visit Secunia’s test page. It truly is a spooky thing to see.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Patch Watch

Flash causes headaches for home patchers

Susan bradley Last month was rough for home patchers — and this month isn’t looking much better.

It seems like only a few days ago we were dealing with issues with Outlook Express and Windows Shell. Here we are this month with another patch that so far looks a bit tricky to get on our boxes, especially for home users without a patch-management adminstrator.

MS06-020 (913433)
Prior versions of Flash cause issues

Already the newsgroups are showing the impact of the known issues in MS06-020 (913433). The problems are now documented by Microsoft in the underlying Knowledge Base article 913433.

The problem basically occurs when you upgraded to Flash version 7 or 8 without removing Flash version 6. You find that the patch keeps getting offered to you.

If you’re having this issue, where the patch just won’t install, there are a few workarounds. The first I would call the "shotgun" approach. If you know you have version 7 or 8, you can simply tell Windows Update or Microsoft Update to stop offering the patch to you. How do you know what version of Flash player you have? It’s actually pretty easy: go to the Adobe Web site and right-mouse click on the graphic at the top.

An alternative is to delete the Flash.ocx and Swflash.ocx files, but that is a bit too extreme.

Your best bet is to uninstall Flash 6 and then upgrade to version 7 or 8. If you’ve been following Patch Watch in the past, you probably already did this step, as the problem with Adobe’s Flash is not new.

The latest version is on Adobe’s Web site.

MS06-019 (916803)
Exchange patch haunts Blackberry admins

The next patch that needs extra care is this month’s Exchange patch, MS06-019 (916803). The threat is from automated calendar attachments that you get in meeting requests. These allow you to easily tell what time zone the meeting is in and the applets will convert the time for you. The problem is that they can be maliciously used to gain remote access to the server that’s running Exchange 2000 or 2003.

Blackberry administrators have to watch out for permission changes that go into effect when this patch is deployed. While KB 912918 discusses the issue, the better discussion is running on the "new" Exchange blog at MSExchangeTeam.com  Specifically see the blog post back in January that talked about these issues.

If you’re running Exchange 2000 or 2003 and Microsoft Update does not offer you this patch, you might want to make sure that you truly are running Microsoft Update. The fix will not be offered up unless you have moved from Windows Update to Microsoft Update.

Remember that Windows Update only patches operating system issues, whereas Microsoft Update is patching more and more of Microsoft’s other software as well. MU isn’t offering patches for all systems — for example, SQL Server is still a manual patch — but most Microsoft products are being covered.

For fellow SBS 2003 administrators, even though the patch states that rebooting is not required, on SBS 2003 boxes, it is required. So be sure to do this patch after hours or during down time.

MS06-018 (913580)
2005 MDTC patch is repatched

The last time Microsoft’s Distributed Transaction Coordinator was patched in MS05-051, I wasn’t sure what it did. This time, when it’s being repatched for a missed Denial of Service issue, I’m still not sure what it does.

The good news is that it’s just the MDTC part of the MS05-051 patch that is being revisited in MS06-018 (913580). So it appears that we shouldn’t also have a revisit of the "buggy patch" issue. That’s where the prior patch interacted with customized permissions that admins had set on machines.

Running a beta is not the answer

I was flabbergasted, to say the least, when I read Chicago Tribune technology columnist James Coates’ answer to a poster in his May 2 column (reg required). The poster complained that, after some recent updates, the person could no longer go to www.yahoo.com without putting in the http:// part.

The columnist’s answer was not to tell the questioner to get the updated patch to MS06-015, detailed in KB 918165. You can get this by revisiting Windows Update. No, his response was that they should run IE 7 Beta 2 on their machine because he said it was “rock solid.”

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


 
Perimeter Scan

Some excellent reasons to update Firefox

Ryan russell There are some interesting issues with Firefox this time around.

While they do represent genuine problems with Mozilla’s open-source browser, some of the details still make me happy with my decision to recommend Firefox.

Firefox exploits are in the wild

In my Mar. 30 column, I broke down and joined the people who recommend that you use any browser other than Internet Explorer. I also promised to let you know when I saw those other browsers being exploited. So, about a month and a half later, I’m here to let you know about a Firefox exploit that’s being used in the wild.

There’s no reason to panic or switch away from Firefox. This is an old exploit that affects ancient versions of Firefox, if you measure in Internet years.

I hope you’re already running Firefox 1.5 or higher, so you get an automatic download of incremental updates. To Mozilla’s credit, new versions of Firefox aren’t affected by the exploit that’s currently circulating.

I first heard about this in a Sunbelt blog entry on Apr. 24. The post has screenshots of a Web exploit kit that’s making the rounds.

Someone is selling entire Web-based exploit management packages for scammers to use. These miscreants don’t have to know any of the nasty technical details. They just install the package, and it takes care of detecting the browser, serving the best exploit, and tracking statistics. That’s interesting in and of itself, but the bit I found most interesting was the list of browser exploits used. In addition to the usual list of IE exploits, there’s one called MFSA2005-50. It was fixed back in Firefox 1.0.5.

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.


YOUR SUBSCRIPTION

The Windows Secrets Newsletter is published weekly on the 1st through 4th Thursdays of each month, plus occasional news updates. We skip an issue on the 5th Thursday of any month, the week of Thanksgiving, and the last two weeks of August and December. Windows Secrets is a continuation of four merged publications: Brian's Buzz on Windows and Woody's Windows Watch in 2004, the LangaList in 2006, and the Support Alert Newsletter in 2008.

Publisher: WindowsSecrets.com, 1218 Third Ave., Suite 1515, Seattle, WA 98101 USA. Vendors, please send no unsolicited packages to this address (readers' letters are fine).

Editor in chief: Tracey Capen. Senior editors: Fred Langa, Woody Leonhard. Copyeditor: Roberta Scholz. Program director: Tony Johnston. Contributing editors: Yardena Arar, Susan Bradley, Scott Dunn, Michael Lasky, Scott Mace, Ryan Russell, Lincoln Spector, Robert Vamosi, Becky Waring. Product manager: Andy Boyd. Advertising director: Eric Gilley.

Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, Support Alert, LangaList, LangaList Plus, WinFind, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of WindowsSecrets.com. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.

HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: Anyone may subscribe to this newsletter by visiting our free signup page.

WE GUARANTEE YOUR PRIVACY:

1. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever.
2. We will never send you any unrequested e-mail, besides newsletter updates.
3. All unsubscribe requests are honored immediately, period.  Privacy policy

HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: To unsubscribe from the Windows Secrets Newsletter,
  • Visit our Unsubscribe page.
Copyright © 2012 by WindowsSecrets.com. All rights reserved.

Table of contents

Top-scoring articles in the past 12 months
  • Leaving long cookie trails throughout the Web 5.00
  • Windows-like security for Android devices 5.00
  • Win7′s no-reformat, nondestructive reinstall 4.53
  • The sorry tale of the (un)Secure Sockets Layer 4.42
  • RPV: Win7′s least-known data-protection system 4.33
  • Recovery: the last step in total data security 4.30
  • Time for a .NET update we can’t ignore 4.30
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 1 4.25
  • Revising printing habits saves money and trees 4.25
  • Upgrades end in erratic, partial hangs 4.25
  • Pros and cons of a ‘keyfile’ password 4.21
  • Beating back Duku and a plethora of other threats 4.20
  • Office 2007 gets its final service pack 4.19
  • Putting Registry-/system-cleanup apps to the test 4.19
  • One year and 99 security bulletins later 4.18
  • 1.8TB external drive goes down hard 4.17
  • Don’t pay for software you don’t need — Part 3 4.16
  • Internet Explorer gets another round of patches 4.15
  • Is your free AV tool a ‘resource pig?’ 4.15
  • Vacation’s over; it’s a big round of patches 4.15
  • Remote access leads to remote attacks 4.15
  • Keeping you up to date: say no to .NET — again 4.14
  • Take control of Google’s privacy policy settings 4.14
  • Office File Validation patch leads to problems 4.14
  • The advanced system-recover toolkit 4.13
  • New “419″ scam involves PayPal and Western Union 4.12
  • Readers’ best personal-privacy tips 4.11
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 2 4.11
  • Re-examining Dropbox and its alternatives 4.10
  • Easily edit Windows’ right-click context menus 4.09
Connect with us Follow us on Twitter Connect with us on Facebook View our RSS Feeds
  • Home|
  • Newsletter|
  • About Windows Secrets|
  • Advertise with us|
  • Unsubscribe|
  • Sitemap|
  • Affiliates|
Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, WinFind, Windows Gizmos, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of iNET Interactive. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.
iNET Interactive Copyright © 2011 iNET Interactive.
All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy
Internet Services
  • Web Hosting Talk
  • HostingCon
  • Hosting Catalog
  • Host Voice
Web Development
  • Hot Scripts
  • DB Forums
Digital Marketing
  • ABestWeb
  • Search Marketing Standard
  • PayPerClickUniverse
  • SEMCompare
Consumer Tech
  • Windows Secrets
  • Overclockers
  • Mac Forums

Learn more about
advertising opportunities across the iNET Interactive Network.

LiquidWeb