Windows Secrets

Subscribers: Sign in

Enter your e-mail address to get a free subscription.
We guarantee your privacy
Skip to content
  • Home
  • Newsletter Archives
    • Current
    • LangaList Plus
    • Patch Watch
    • Wacky Web Week
    • Security Baseline
  • E-Books
  • Lounge
  • About us
    • Refunds
    • Privacy Policy
    • Advertise
  • Contact
  • Your Account
    • Upgrade
    • Preferences
    • Bonus Download
    • Unsubscribe
Home>PC Tune-Up>The best — and worst — personal firewalls

The best — and worst — personal firewalls

Tweet

Mark edwards By Mark Joseph Edwards

If you chose the firewall on your PC based on reputation, you may be in for an unpleasant surprise.

The Matousec Firewall Challenge answers the million-dollar question: “Is my firewall really protecting me?”


Firewalls that pass the leak test

Defending against data leaks is an important aspect of any firewall. Leak-testing sites such as the popular PC Flank help you determine whether a given firewall can stand up to the various tricks that the bad guys pull in their efforts to steal your data.

I recently came across a leak-testing project that I consider to be above and beyond the others: the Firewall Challenge is run by Matousec, a security consulting and research group named after its founder, David Matousek. The security researchers and consultants of Matousec bring far more knowledge to firewall leak testing than most competing sites, which gives me more confidence in their results.

Over the past several weeks, the Matousec team has been putting personal firewalls through the wringer. Their tests are based on four categories: data leaks; terminations; bypasses; and stability, reliability, and other factors. Matousec tests using Windows XP with SP2 and Internet Explorer 6.

So far, the results are staggering: of the 19 firewalls tested, 10 failed miserably (including Windows Live OneCare) and as such should not be relied upon to protect your system. Only five of the firewalls tested received a rating of “excellent” or “very good.” Three others were rated “good,” and one was rated “poor.”

This article is part of our paid content. Subscribe.

Already a paid subscriber? Click here to login.

Related posts:

  1. How does your firewall rate?
  2. New Firewall Leak Tests
  3. Free Firewalls
  4. Evaluating Firewalls
  5. Dueling Firewalls
= Paid content

All Windows Secrets articles posted on 2008-04-17:

  • Introduction Two search engines help you find Windows info
  • Top Story Flash ads bearing malware plague popular sites
  • Wacky Web Week The U.S. election process, in a nutshell
  • LangaList Plus Three fast, thorough, easy-to-use disk cleaners
  • PC Tune-Up The best — and worst — personal firewalls
  • Patch Watch .NET Service Pack 1 creates a tax-season .MESS
  •  Show all articles on a single page
E-books

We’ve pored through years of back issues, picking the best tips, to create these ebooks:

E-book series
  • PC Maintenance Guide
  • PC Security Guide
  • Windows 7 Guide Vol 1
  • Windows 7 Guide Vol 2
  • Win XP Survival Guide
See the e-book series
Top-scoring articles in the past 12 months
  • Leaving long cookie trails throughout the Web 5.00
  • Windows-like security for Android devices 5.00
  • Win7′s no-reformat, nondestructive reinstall 4.53
  • The sorry tale of the (un)Secure Sockets Layer 4.42
  • RPV: Win7′s least-known data-protection system 4.33
  • Recovery: the last step in total data security 4.30
  • Time for a .NET update we can’t ignore 4.30
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 1 4.25
  • Revising printing habits saves money and trees 4.25
  • Upgrades end in erratic, partial hangs 4.25
  • Pros and cons of a ‘keyfile’ password 4.21
  • Office 2007 gets its final service pack 4.19
  • Putting Registry-/system-cleanup apps to the test 4.19
  • Beating back Duku and a plethora of other threats 4.19
  • One year and 99 security bulletins later 4.18
  • 1.8TB external drive goes down hard 4.17
  • Don’t pay for software you don’t need — Part 3 4.16
  • Internet Explorer gets another round of patches 4.15
  • Is your free AV tool a ‘resource pig?’ 4.15
  • Vacation’s over; it’s a big round of patches 4.15
  • Remote access leads to remote attacks 4.15
  • Keeping you up to date: say no to .NET — again 4.14
  • Take control of Google’s privacy policy settings 4.14
  • Office File Validation patch leads to problems 4.14
  • The advanced system-recover toolkit 4.13
  • New “419″ scam involves PayPal and Western Union 4.12
  • Readers’ best personal-privacy tips 4.11
  • Getting the most from Windows Search — Part 2 4.11
  • Re-examining Dropbox and its alternatives 4.10
  • Easily edit Windows’ right-click context menus 4.09
Connect with us Follow us on Twitter Connect with us on Facebook View our RSS Feeds
  • Home|
  • Newsletter|
  • About Windows Secrets|
  • Advertise with us|
  • Unsubscribe|
  • Sitemap|
  • Affiliates|
Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, WinFind, Windows Gizmos, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of iNET Interactive. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners.
iNET Interactive Copyright © 2011 iNET Interactive.
All rights reserved.
Terms of Use  |  Privacy Policy
Internet Services
  • Web Hosting Talk
  • HostingCon
  • Hosting Catalog
  • Host Voice
Web Development
  • Hot Scripts
  • DB Forums
Digital Marketing
  • ABestWeb
  • Search Marketing Standard
  • PayPerClickUniverse
  • SEMCompare
Consumer Tech
  • Windows Secrets
  • Overclockers
  • Mac Forums

Learn more about
advertising opportunities across the iNET Interactive Network.

LiquidWeb