|
|
|
Windows Secrets Newsletter • Issue 194 • 2009-04-16 • Circulation: over 400,000 |
|
BONUS DOWNLOAD
|
|
Table of contents TOP STORY: Windows Genuine Advantage is still genuinely bad KNOWN ISSUES: Call to learn whether your Dell or HP is covered WACKY WEB WEEK: Feeling twitterpated? You're not the only one! LANGALIST PLUS: Solving "me first" software startup conflicts PC TUNE-UP: There'll be no easy upgrade from XP to Windows 7 PATCH WATCH: Critical patches released for Internet Explorer |
|
ADS
|
|
TOP STORY Windows Genuine Advantage is still genuinely bad
By
Ryan Russell
Microsoft's system for validating Windows before users can download most updates continues to be a problem for legitimate customers and for Internet security as a whole. Despite claims of offering better security, Windows Genuine Advantage (WGA) serves only Microsoft's marketing interests — but you can eliminate the need for WGA if you know the trick. Microsoft has long been considered a marketing bully, but with WGA the company has taken its lack of consideration for its customers to a new low. Windows Secrets has been tracking the WGA story for years. Editorial director Brian Livingston aptly labeled an earlier version of WGA as "Microsoft spyware" in a June 15, 2006, Top Story. More recently, Brian remarked in a March 30, 2009, news update that PCs failing WGA validation don't automatically receive all available patches from Microsoft. That spawned a critique from a Microsoft spokeswoman which was printed, along with Brian's response, in technical editor Dennis O'Reilly's Known Issues column on April 2. (There's also an Office Genuine Advantage program, which you hear less about but has the same problems as WGA.) We all want Windows systems throughout the world to be patched for security problems as soon as fixes are released. As a result of the fuss raised by the articles mentioned above, I decided to take another look at WGA. Here's what happens if a Windows machine fails WGA validation (or the PC's owner, based on tales of disabled machines, is too frightened to run WGA):
Let's examine how various people and companies are using this method. How companies patch Windows and avoid WGA An individual who wants to avoid WGA hassles could visit Microsoft's current security bulletin page and browse every new patch and advisory. However, it's unreasonable to expect average Windows users to read each bulletin and decide which patches to install. A better solution is to use patch-management (PM) software. Every day, dozens of third-party vendors obtain patches from known locations that Microsoft hosts on the Internet. Once the patches are downloaded by the vendors, their software can push the patches out to PCs on a LAN with no worries about WGA. (Disclosure: The company I work for, BigFix Inc., sells a patch-management product that does this for large enterprises.) Corporations should install a PM solution that resides on a server and pushes patches to individual PCs across a LAN. Network Computing publishes a Rolling Reviews page that analyzes several major PM applications. Individual PC users have several options to install all security patches — whether rated "Critical," "Important," or any other level of severity — without WGA hassles. The following are a few examples:
The third-party services mentioned above are compelled by Microsoft to get Windows patches directly from Microsoft's own servers. That means these services can only install security patches and other updates whose files will install without requiring WGA validation. Fortunately, almost all Windows security patches (of all severity levels) and many other Microsoft updates install fine — regardless of WGA — if you download the files directly or via a third-party service. Microsoft currently lists on a Genuine Software page a few of its apps that do require WGA, such as Windows Defender, Windows Media Player, and Calculator Plus. In fairness, Microsoft should get credit for posting all of its security patches (of all levels of severity) on publicly available URLs. At least this policy does provide the files to patch-management professionals who know these locations. By contrast, such firms as Red Hat, Sun, and IBM require contracts and log-in credentials before you can obtain some of these companies' Linux, Solaris, and AIX patches, respectively. The big question is this: why would Microsoft cripple its consumer patching tools — Windows Update and Microsoft Update — by disabling them if a PC doesn't pass WGA validation? The only logical reason I can think of is because Microsoft wants to push WGA, and denying updates to users is the best stick the company can come up with. I believe this decision is a huge mistake. Windows Update is a crucial service that must remain free from chicanery, because Windows Update is the default program for on-demand security checkups. In computing, defaults are everything. Windows Update is installed and available in every recent copy of Windows on the planet, whether those machines are correctly licensed or not. Many people disable Automatic Updates because it's intrusive and has been used in the past to install WGA and other nonsecurity updates. If users can't run Windows Update as an alternative to AU, there's a massive problem on the Internet. The battle against malware is already bad enough, and we don't need anything to make the problem worse. When millions of computers become infected, the attacks from these machines become a problem for you, the paying customer of Microsoft. DRM exists at the expense of paying customers Call it what you will: WGA, Digital Rights Management (DRM), anti-piracy, or copy protection. It abuses the hospitality of paying customers in an attempt to thwart those who don't want to pay. I don't object one bit to paying Microsoft for the software I use. I do object to being forced to help a company in futile efforts to combat copyright violators. Copy-protection harms legitimate users who are inconvenienced at best and forced to cope with nonfunctional software at worst. The bad guys, by contrast, aren't harmed much at all. Pirate operations have the money and time to defeat every copy-protection mechanism. Once pirates have broken a DRM scheme, the unlocked software might be salable for months without the pirates' needing to deal with the protection any further. Do you dislike having to insert a CD into a drive to update Microsoft Office or play a game? Guess what: users of the pirated versions of those programs generally don't have to deal with that. Only the legitimate buyers are inconvenienced. I've been analyzing flavors of copy protection since the early 1980s. During those nearly 30 years, it's always been the same. Copy protection primarily hurts legitimate users while giving bad guys merely a short period of entertainment. I do recognize the gray area between the two extremes. There are many users who might violate a software publisher's copyright if it were convenient to do so. But I still believe that the punishment imposed on a software company's best customers is not worth the tiny impact on the real pirates. I'm not saying Microsoft has to give away its products for free. I'm saying that a copyright owner's battle against piracy is not my problem, so please quit making my life hard in a vain attempt to resolve your legal issues. Microsoft's lack of support for its best users, in the name of protecting intellectual property, sometimes reaches absurd levels. A recent example of this is Microsoft's refusal to support its software on virtual machines unless the VM software is Microsoft's own. (You can read the details about this in my blog entry posted April 2.) Microsoft has gotten really aggressive about license protection. The pendulum needs to swing back in the direction of making things easier for the company's customers. Ryan Russell is quality assurance manager at BigFix Inc., a configuration management company. He moderated the vuln-dev mailing list for three years under the alias "Blue Boar." He was the lead author of Hack-Proofing Your Network, 2nd Ed., and the technical editor of the Stealing the Network book series. |
|
KNOWN ISSUES Call to learn whether your Dell or HP is covered
By
Dennis O'Reilly
You can't rely on the information you find on some vendor Web sites to determine whether your overheating notebook qualifies for a free repair or replacement. In a case recently publicized by Windows Secrets, you would need to contact the company's tech-support staff directly to find out whether your system is covered by a special extended warranty. One of the more-disturbing trends in the computer industry is the silent recall. In such cases, a vendor replaces faulty equipment only after the customer complains about it, rather than actively contacting buyers of the defective products. This appears to be the approach HP and Dell are taking with notebook computers they sold — computers that use a defective Nvidia GPU (graphics processing unit) that overheats, burning out laptops and tablets. WS contributing editor Michael Lasky described the problem with these notebooks in a Top Story in last week's newsletter. He included links to a Dell forum thread and an HP forum thread, both of which describe the problem and provide more information. However, several readers asked us for specific pages on the vendors' sites, to determine whether a particular notebook is affected. Unfortunately, the problem seems to affect even more Dell and HP models than are listed by the vendors. Trevor Valentine found out first-hand how difficult it is to find this information:
I have personal experience that the HP list is incomplete, because an HP tablet that I owned — a Pavilion TX1100, which used the faulty Nvidia chip and got fried after only 18 months of use — is not included. Tom Rupsis reminds us of another way to get a replacement for a defective product whose warranty recently expired:
Tech support likes Malwarebytes' antispyware Recommendations continue to pour in from readers in response to Ryan Russell's March 26 Top Story on programs that should be considered for the WS Security Baseline. A letter from an anonymous Microsoft tech-support staffer caught our attention:
The free version of Anti-Malware, the program the MS staffer recommends, allows you to perform manual scans for spyware on your system. For U.S. $24.95, you can unlock the program's real-time protection, scheduled scanning, and scheduled updating. For more info, see Malwarebytes' download page.
The Known Issues column brings you readers' comments on our recent articles. Dennis O'Reilly is technical editor of WindowsSecrets.com. |
|
WACKY WEB WEEK Feeling twitterpated? You're not the only one!
|
|
ADS
|
|
PERMALINKS Use these permalinks to share info with friends We love it when you include the links shown below in e-mails to your friends. This is better than forwarding your copy of our e-mail newsletter. (When our newsletter is forwarded, some recipients click "report as spam," and corporate filters start blocking our e-mails.) The following link includes all articles this week: http://WindowsSecrets.com/comp/090416 Free content posted on April 16, 2009:
You get all of the following in our paid content:
Thanks in advance for your support! |
|
YOUR SUBSCRIPTION The Windows Secrets Newsletter is published weekly on the 1st through 4th Thursdays of each month, plus occasional news updates. We skip an issue on the 5th Thursday of any month, the week of Thanksgiving, and the last two weeks of August and December. Windows Secrets resulted from the merger of several publications: Brian's Buzz on Windows and Woody's Windows Watch in 2004, the LangaList in 2006, and the Support Alert Newsletter in 2008. Publisher: WindowsSecrets.com LLC, Attn: #120 Editor, 1700 7th Ave., Suite 116, Seattle, WA 98101-1323 USA. Vendors, please send no unsolicited packages to this address (readers' letters are fine). Editorial Director: Brian Livingston. Senior Editor: Ian Richards. Editor-at-Large: Fred Langa. Technical Editor: Dennis O'Reilly. Program Director: Tony Johnston. Program Manager: Ryan Biesemeyer. Web Developer: Damian Wadley. Research Director: Katy Abby. Copyeditor: Roberta Scholz. Contributing Editors: Susan Bradley, Scott Dunn, Mark Joseph Edwards, Michael Lasky, Woody Leonhard, Ryan Russell, Becky Waring. Trademarks: Microsoft and Windows are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation. The Windows Secrets series of books is published by Wiley Publishing Inc. The Windows Secrets Newsletter, WindowsSecrets.com, Support Alert, LangaList, LangaList Plus, WinFind, Security Baseline, Patch Watch, Perimeter Scan, Wacky Web Week, the Logo Design (W, S or road, and Star), and the slogan Everything Microsoft Forgot to Mention all are trademarks and service marks of WindowsSecrets.com LLC. All other marks are the trademarks or service marks of their respective owners. HOW TO SUBSCRIBE: Anyone may subscribe to this newsletter by visiting our free signup page. WE GUARANTEE YOUR PRIVACY: 1. We will never sell, rent, or give away your address to any outside party, ever. 2. We will never send you any unrequested e-mail, besides newsletter updates. 3. All unsubscribe requests are honored immediately, period. Privacy policy HOW TO UNSUBSCRIBE: To unsubscribe from the Windows Secrets Newsletter,
|